Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Pan-myeloid Differentiation of Human Cord Blood Derived CD34+ Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells
Published on: August 9, 2019
Compatibility of RUNX1/ETO fusion protein modules driving CD34+ human progenitor cell expansion
Linping Chen-Wichmann1, Marina Shvartsman1, Caro Preiss1
1Department of Transfusion Medicine, Cell Therapeutics and Hemostaseology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
RUNX1/ETO’s NHR2 and NHR4 domains are not essential for its oncogenic activity in acute myeloid leukemia. These domains can be functionally replaced by other protein domains, suggesting a modular nature of RUNX1/ETO function.
Area of Science:
- Molecular biology
- Hematology
- Cancer research
Background:
- Chromosomal translocations, particularly t(8;21), are common in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
- The RUNX1/ETO fusion protein, resulting from t(8;21), plays a critical role in leukemogenesis.
- The RUNX1/ETO protein contains nervy homology regions (NHRs) crucial for its function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the specific roles and essentiality of the NHR2 and NHR4 domains within the RUNX1/ETO fusion protein.
- To determine if the functions of NHR2 and NHR4 can be substituted by heterologous protein domains.
Main Methods:
- Construction and analysis of C-terminally truncated RUNX1/ETO variants with altered NHR domains.
- Assessment of nuclear translocation, DNA binding, target gene repression, and progenitor cell transformation.
- Utilizing an inducible protein assembly system to study early functional requirements.
Main Results:
- A truncated RUNX1/ETO lacking NHR3/4 and with a substituted NHR2 domain retained nuclear localization and DNA binding but lost oncogenic activity.
- Restoration of transforming capacity was achieved by fusing NHR4 or a N-CoR repressor domain to the truncated protein.
- NHR4 domain activity was critical early in the process for cells expressing the modified RUNX1/ETO.
Conclusions:
- The NHR2 and NHR4 domains of RUNX1/ETO are not structurally indispensable and can be functionally replaced by heterologous domains.
- RUNX1/ETO activity can be reconstituted through modular recombination of functional domains, including those from RUNX1, ETO, BCR, and N-CoR.
- The findings suggest that the recurrent translocation of RUNX1 to ETO family members may be due to the presence of essential tetramerization and transcriptional repression moieties in ETO.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Tagging and Fusion Proteins
Nuclear Fusion
A helium nucleus has a mass that is 0.7% less than that of four hydrogen nuclei; this lost mass is converted into energy during the fusion. This reaction produces about...
Energy to Drive Translocation
Generally, polypeptides are unfolded by two distinct...
Heat and Free Expansion
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...
Differentiation of Common Myeloid Progenitor Cells

