Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Evaluation of national guidelines for bronchiolitis: AGREEments and controversies
Diana Cavaye1, Daniel P Roberts1, Gemma L Saravanos2
1Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Insights
This study appraised national bronchiolitis guidelines, finding them high-quality with consistent recommendations for infant respiratory illness management. Areas for improvement include applicability and editorial independence, with specific controversies needing further research.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric respiratory medicine
- Clinical guideline appraisal
Background:
- Bronchiolitis is a frequent infant hospitalization cause.
- Existing national guidelines require evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To appraise three recent national bronchiolitis guidelines.
- To compare recommendations and identify areas of agreement and divergence.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the AGREE II tool for guideline appraisal.
- Involved medical students and senior clinicians in a two-stage review process.
Main Results:
- Guidelines demonstrated high overall quality, excelling in clarity, scope, and rigor.
- Significant consistency observed across recommendations.
- Key differences noted in palivizumab use, continuous pulse oximetry, and viral testing.
Conclusions:
- Appraised guidelines are high-quality with substantial agreement for managing this common pediatric condition.
- Identified weaknesses in applicability and editorial independence.
- Highlighted three areas requiring further research for evidence-based recommendations.
Aim:
Bronchiolitis is a common respiratory illness and is a leading cause of hospitalisation in infancy. We aimed to appraise three recent national bronchiolitis guidelines produced by the Australasian Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in the UK and the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Methods:
A group of final-year medical students and one senior clinician used the AGREE II tool to appraise each guideline in two stages. First, two students appraised each guideline independently and presented their results. Second, two self-selected students met with the senior clinicians to review all scores to ensure completeness of the appraisal and consistency of AGREE II application.
Results:
The guidelines scored well overall, with particular strengths in the domains of clarity of presentation, scope and purpose and rigour of development. Comparison of the recommendations across each guideline demonstrated a high degree of consistency. Notable differences included recommendations for the role of palivizumab in prevention of bronchiolitis, the use of continuous pulse oximetry monitoring in the hospitalised patient and the value of respiratory virus testing.
Conclusions:
Our appraisal of bronchiolitis guidelines from three high-income countries demonstrated that they were of high quality, with substantial areas of agreement. Most aspects of clinical practice should be uniform for this common paediatric condition. Areas of guideline weakness were in the domains of applicability and editorial independence. We identified three areas of controversy where further research is needed to support stronger evidence-based recommendations.
Related Concept Videos
01:26National Nursing Organizations I
01:30National Nursing Organizations II
The AACN emphasizes a healthy work environment through six standards to achieve an optimal patient outcome. The standards are appropriate staffing, meaningful recognition, collaboration, authentic leadership, effective communication, and decision-making. In addition, AACN provides certification programs, webinars, journals, and...
01:11Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
01:30Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
01:23Guidelines for Sketching a Curve
01:26Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.