Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Intraoperative Ultrasound in Spinal Surgery
Published on: August 17, 2022
Analysis of Multimodal Intraoperative Monitoring During Intramedullary Spinal Ependymoma Surgery
Jong-Hyeok Park1, Sun-Ho Lee2, Eun-Sang Kim2
1Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, South Korea.
The all-or-none criterion for intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) and motor-evoked potential (MEP) monitoring is more effective than a 50% decline in predicting outcomes after spinal ependymoma surgery. This improved accuracy persists for six months post-operation.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Neurology
- Spinal Cord Monitoring
Background:
- Intramedullary spinal ependymomas require precise surgical techniques.
- Intraoperative monitoring using somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) and motor-evoked potentials (MEP) is crucial for preserving neurological function.
- Evaluating the effectiveness of different monitoring criteria is essential for optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the diagnostic validity of SSEP and MEP monitoring during intramedullary spinal ependymoma surgery.
- To compare the efficacy of two warning criteria: 50% decline versus all-or-none.
- To determine the long-term predictive value of these monitoring techniques for up to six months post-surgery.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 26 patients undergoing intramedullary spinal ependymoma surgery with SSEP and MEP monitoring.
- Evaluation of monitoring sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic odds ratio for each criterion.
- Postoperative neurological deficit assessment using the Medical Research Council scale and six-month follow-up.
Main Results:
- SSEP and MEP monitoring demonstrated high success rates (84.9% and 83.7%).
- The all-or-none criterion exhibited superior specificity, positive predictive value, and diagnostic odds ratio compared to the 50% decline criterion.
- SSEP validity was higher for upper extremities, while MEP was more effective for lower extremities; significant neurological improvement was observed in most patients within six months.
Conclusions:
- Intraoperative SSEP and MEP monitoring can yield false-positive and false-negative results, particularly in the immediate postoperative period.
- The all-or-none criterion provides a more reliable assessment of postoperative neurological status than the 50% decline criterion.
- The superior predictive performance of the all-or-none criterion is sustained for up to six months following surgery.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Drug Analysis Methods
Spinal Cord
The Spinal Cord
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Spinal Cord: Information Processing
Sensory Information Processing
Sensory information processing begins at the sensory receptors located in the skin and other tissues, which detect somatic sensory stimuli such as touch, temperature, or pain. These receptors function as catalysts, initiating...

