Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Functions of Connective Tissues01:17

Functions of Connective Tissues

16.8K
Connective tissues perform a broad range of functions in the body. Their primary function is to connect and link different tissues in the body and act as packaging material between tissues. The areolar tissue, a connective tissue prototype, commonly cements various tissue types in diverse body organs. In contrast, adipose tissue cushions internal organs while insulating the body from heat loss.
Hard connective tissues, such as bones and cartilage, provide structure and support to the body.
16.8K
Network Function of a Circuit01:25

Network Function of a Circuit

840
Frequency response analysis in electrical circuits provides vital insights into a circuit's behavior as the frequency of the input signal changes. The transfer function, a mathematical tool, is instrumental in understanding this behavior. It defines the relationship between phasor output and input and comes in four types: voltage gain, current gain, transfer impedance, and transfer admittance. The critical components of the transfer function are the poles and zeros.
840
Protein Networks02:26

Protein Networks

4.6K
An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
4.6K
Subliminal Perception01:15

Subliminal Perception

794
Subliminal perception refers to the processing of sensory information that occurs below the level of conscious awareness. Researchers study subliminal perception by presenting a stimulus, such as a word or image, very quickly, typically around 50 milliseconds. This rapid presentation is often followed by another stimulus, such as a pattern of dots or lines, which blocks further mental processing of the initial stimulus. As a result, if participants cannot identify the initial stimulus better...
794
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

2.8K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
2.8K
Perception01:28

Perception

1.2K
Perception is a fundamental psychological process that enables individuals to organize, interpret, and consciously experience sensory information. This process is crucial for understanding and interacting with the world around us. It includes both bottom-up and top-down processing, each playing a distinct role in how we perceive our environment.
Bottom-up processing begins at the sensory level, where receptors detect external environmental stimuli. These could include the tactile sensation of...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Selective Neural Responses to Conspecific Vocalizations in Marmoset Area 32.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Quantifying the effect of forest edge on tropical fauna using explainable ecoacoustics metricsa).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Universal and culture-tuned neural codes for vocal emotion: an fMRI MVPA study using Japanese and Canadian voices.

Oxford open neuroscience·2026
Same author

Voice information processing by the primate brain.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Reconstructing voice identity from noninvasive auditory cortex recordings.

eLife·2026
Same author

Mortality associated with the perioperative management of patients with proximal femur fractures: A machine learning prediction model.

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Network Analysis of the Default Mode Network Using Functional Connectivity MRI in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
12:09

Network Analysis of the Default Mode Network Using Functional Connectivity MRI in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

Published on: August 5, 2014

18.5K

Functional connectivity within the voice perception network and its behavioural relevance.

Virginia Aglieri1, Thierry Chaminade2, Sylvain Takerkart2

  • 1Institut des Neurosciences de la Timone, UMR 7289, CNRS and Université Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France.

Neuroimage
|August 13, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Individual differences in voice recognition are linked to brain activity. Functional connectivity between frontal and temporal voice areas predicts how well people recognize voices, highlighting frontal regions

Keywords:
Auditory cortexFunctional connectivityIndividual differencesVoice perceptionVoice recognitionfMRI

More Related Videos

Automated Deployment of an Internet Protocol Telephony Service on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using Network Functions Virtualization
07:49

Automated Deployment of an Internet Protocol Telephony Service on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using Network Functions Virtualization

Published on: November 26, 2019

8.5K
A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance
09:01

A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance

Published on: May 7, 2014

10.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Network Analysis of the Default Mode Network Using Functional Connectivity MRI in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
12:09

Network Analysis of the Default Mode Network Using Functional Connectivity MRI in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

Published on: August 5, 2014

18.5K
Automated Deployment of an Internet Protocol Telephony Service on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using Network Functions Virtualization
07:49

Automated Deployment of an Internet Protocol Telephony Service on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using Network Functions Virtualization

Published on: November 26, 2019

8.5K
A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance
09:01

A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance

Published on: May 7, 2014

10.6K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Auditory Perception

Background:

  • Voice recognition varies significantly among individuals.
  • Brain networks, including temporal voice areas (TVAs) and frontal cortices, support voice perception.
  • Inter-individual variability in brain activity (BOLD) during voice processing is notable.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate functional connectivity (FC) within voice-sensitive brain regions.
  • To explore the relationship between FC patterns and individual voice recognition abilities.
  • To elucidate the role of frontal regions in voice perception and individual differences.

Main Methods:

  • fMRI voice localizer task (passive listening to voices vs. non-voices).
  • Computation of FC within 12 individually defined temporal and frontal voice patches (N=90).
  • Correlation analysis between FC and behavioral voice recognition test scores.

Main Results:

  • Voice patches showed positive co-activation during voice listening.
  • FC patterns varied based on location (anterior/posterior) and hemisphere.
  • Increased FC between right frontal and temporal voice patches correlated with better voice recognition.

Conclusions:

  • Frontal regions play a crucial role in voice perception.
  • FC analysis between stimulus-specific and frontal regions aids understanding of individual differences in social stimulus processing.
  • This study underscores the neural basis of individual variability in voice recognition.