Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Trans-Tympanic Drug Delivery for the Treatment of Ototoxicity
Published on: March 16, 2018
Natural History of Tympanic Membrane Retraction in Children with Cleft Palate
William Parkes1, Luis Vilchez-Madrigal2, Sharon Cushing3
1Clinic of Otolaryngology, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Insights
Most tympanic membrane retractions in children with cleft palate remain stable or improve over time. Significant progression, including cholesteatoma development, is infrequent, supporting a conservative management approach.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Pediatric Otology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Tympanic membrane retraction (TMR) natural history is unpredictable.
- Children with cleft palate are at higher risk for eustachian tube dysfunction and subsequent TMR.
- Prognostic information is crucial for guiding surveillance and treatment decisions in pediatric TMR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively evaluate the natural history of tympanic membrane retraction in children with cleft palate.
- To identify prognostic factors for TMR progression over a 5-year period.
- To inform management strategies for TMR in this high-risk pediatric population.
Main Methods:
- Prospective observational study of 37 ears with pars tensa retraction in children with cleft palate.
- Otoendoscopic image capture and audiometry performed at baseline and follow-up (median 6.4 years).
- Retraction severity assessed by blinded pediatric otolaryngologists comparing serial images.
Main Results:
- 76% of retractions were stable or improved over 5 years.
- 5% of total retractions developed cholesteatoma; no ossicular erosion occurred without cholesteatoma.
- Conductive hearing loss was infrequent and often resolved spontaneously; no new hearing loss developed in initially normal ears.
Conclusions:
- Tympanic membrane retractions in children with cleft palate frequently remain stable or improve.
- Clinically significant progression is uncommon, supporting a conservative management strategy.
- Long-term observational data are essential for balancing intervention benefits against observation in TMR management.
Objectives:
The natural history of tympanic membrane retraction is unpredictable. To obtain prognostic information for guiding surveillance and treatment, a cohort of children with retraction from cleft palate were prospectively followed for over 5 years.
Materials And Methods:
This was a prospective observational study at a tertiary academic institution. Children with pars tensa retraction were selected from a cohort of 143 children with cleft palate. Thirty-seven ears were assessed with otoendoscopic image capture and audiometry at a median age of 9 years and reassessed at a median follow-up interval of 6.4 years. The severity of tympanic membrane retraction in the serial images of each ear was compared by four pediatric otolaryngologists blinded to the dates of the images.
Results:
Initially, 19/37 retractions (51%) demonstrated contact with the incus and/or promontory. Follow-up images were rated as stable (n=16) or better (n=12) for 28/37 retractions (76%). Of the nine retractions that became more extensive, two developed cholesteatoma (5% of the total). No ossicular erosion developed in ears without cholesteatoma. Conductive hearing loss (4-tone average air-bone gap >25 decibels hearing level) was initially present in five ears, worsened in one, and normalized without intervention in others. No ears with initial normal hearing developed hearing loss.
Conclusion:
Most tympanic membrane retractions remained stable or improved over time in this cohort of children who were at a risk of persistent eustachian tube dysfunction. Clinically significant progression occurred infrequently, justifying the conservative approach taken to manage these retractions. Such data are necessary to weigh the potential benefit of preventive intervention over observation.
Related Concept Videos
Assessing Body Temperature - Tympanic membrane
Step 1: Begin by practicing good hand hygiene to prevent the transmission of microorganisms.
Step 2: Turn on the thermometer and wait until the ready sign appears on the screen to ensure accurate measurement.
Step 3: Slide the probe cover in place to prevent cross-contamination.
Step 4: Instruct the patient to tilt their head to the side for comfort and check for cerumen...
What is Evolutionary History?
Nature and Nurture
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Life Histories
History of Microbiology

