Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization
Published on: April 19, 2017
Can the Bayley Scales of Infant Development at 18 months predict child behaviour at 7 years?
Jacqueline F Gould1,2, Emily Hunt2, Rachel M Roberts2
1Healthy Mothers, Babies and Children, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Insights
The Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II at 18 months showed a weak association with school-age behavioral outcomes in preterm infants. This suggests limited predictive validity for long-term behavioral functioning in this vulnerable population.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Neonatal Follow-up
- Child Psychology
Background:
- Infants born preterm (<37 weeks gestation) face heightened risks for adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes.
- Routine neurodevelopmental assessments, such as the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID), are common in neonatal centers.
- The predictive validity of the BSID for long-term outcomes in preterm infants remains a subject of investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive capacity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II (BSID-II) administered at 18 months.
- To assess the association between BSID-II scores and behavioral functioning at school age (7 years) in children born preterm.
- To explore potential interactions between early developmental assessments and allied health service utilization on later behavioral outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 657 children born before 33 weeks gestation was recruited from Australian neonatal centers.
- Child development was assessed at 18 months corrected age using the BSID-II by a qualified psychologist.
- Parent-reported behavioral functioning at 7 years was measured using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, and Conners 3rd Edition ADHD Index.
Main Results:
- A one-point increase in the BSID-II Mental Development Index was associated with a small decrease in behavioral scores at 7 years.
- Specific associations included: -0.07 for Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Total Difficulties (95% CI -0.10, -0.03).
- Further associations: -0.12 for Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function Global Executive Composite (95% CI -0.21, -0.04) and -0.16 for Conners 3rd Edition ADHD Index (95% CI -0.26, -0.05).
Conclusions:
- The BSID-II administered at 18 months demonstrated a weak association with parent-reported behavioral outcomes at 7 years in preterm children.
- These findings suggest that the BSID-II may have limited predictive utility for school-age behavioral functioning in this high-risk population.
- Further research is warranted to identify more robust predictors of long-term behavioral development in preterm infants.
Aim:
Infants born preterm (<37 weeks' gestation) are at risk of poor neurodevelopmental outcomes; hence, many neonatal centres routinely follow up infants using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID), although the predictive validity of the BSID for children born preterm is questionable. Our objective is to evaluate the predictive capacity of the BSID for behavioural functioning at school age of children born preterm.
Methods:
Children (n = 657 children born <33 weeks' gestation) were enrolled at birth from five neonatal centres around Australia. A psychologist assessed child development at 18 months using the BSID-II. When children were 7 years (corrected age) of age, parents completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function and the Conners 3rd Edition Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Index. We explored associations between BSID-II at 18 months and behaviour scores at 7 years and examined the interaction effect of the use of an allied health service between the BSID-II and behaviour assessments.
Results:
For every one-point increase on the BSID-II Mental Development Index, behaviour scores decreased by 0.07 points for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Total Difficulties (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.10, -0.03), 0.12 points for the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function Global Executive Composite (95% CI -0.21, -0.04) and 0.16 points for the Conners 3rd Edition Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Index (95% CI -0.26, -0.05).
Conclusion:
The BSID-II at 18 months was weakly associated with parent-reported behaviour at 7 years in children born preterm.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
pH Scale
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Scaling
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...

