Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

What is Natural Selection?01:32

What is Natural Selection?

129.6K
Natural selection is an evolutionary process in which individuals with survival-promoting traits reproduce at higher rates. These favorable traits become more common within a population or species. Naturally selected traits initially arise via random genetic mutations. In order for selection to occur, there must be variation within a population, the trait controlling the variation must be heritable, and there must be an evolutionary advantage for variation in the trait.
129.6K
Antibiotic Selection00:57

Antibiotic Selection

60.0K
Overview
60.0K
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

45.2K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
45.2K
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

24.1K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
24.1K
Mutations01:39

Mutations

94.5K
Overview
94.5K
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

35.1K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
35.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Overestimating zero-shot fitness prediction: Broad benchmarks mask local failures and practical limitations.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Evolutionary Rate Variation at Predicted PTM Sites Reveals Localized Host-Associated Patterns in Influenza A Virus.

Genome biology and evolution·2026
Same author

Teaching bioinformatics with generative AI: judgment, uncertainty, and responsibility.

Journal of microbiology & biology education·2026
Same author

Intrinsic dataset features drive mutational effect prediction by protein language models.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

How Binding Affinity and Binding Specificity Map to Sequence Space.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same author

A fold switch regulates conformation of an alphavirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase.

Nucleic acids research·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 6, 2026

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System
07:08

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System

Published on: April 26, 2018

8.4K

Using the Mutation-Selection Framework to Characterize Selection on Protein Sequences.

Ashley I Teufel1, Andrew M Ritchie2, Claus O Wilke3

  • 1Department of Integrative Biology, Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, and Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA. ateufel@utexas.edu.

Genes
|August 15, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review explores models of protein evolution, detailing how mutation and selection probabilities are used to detect evolutionary selection on protein sequences. We examine the original model, its advancements, and underlying assumptions.

Keywords:
evolutionary modelingmutation-selection modelsprotein evolution

More Related Videos

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli
09:01

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli

Published on: March 16, 2011

31.2K
Bacterial Peptide Display for the Selection of Novel Biotinylating Enzymes
10:43

Bacterial Peptide Display for the Selection of Novel Biotinylating Enzymes

Published on: October 3, 2019

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 6, 2026

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System
07:08

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System

Published on: April 26, 2018

8.4K
Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli
09:01

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli

Published on: March 16, 2011

31.2K
Bacterial Peptide Display for the Selection of Novel Biotinylating Enzymes
10:43

Bacterial Peptide Display for the Selection of Novel Biotinylating Enzymes

Published on: October 3, 2019

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Evolution
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Protein evolution is driven by mutation and selection.
  • Detecting selection on protein sequences is crucial for understanding evolutionary processes.
  • Mechanistic modeling provides a framework for studying these evolutionary forces.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the mathematical framework for modeling protein evolution.
  • To discuss advances in methods for detecting selection on protein sequences.
  • To analyze the assumptions inherent in these evolutionary models.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on protein evolution models.
  • Analysis of mathematical frameworks for mutation and fixation probabilities.
  • Discussion of various methods developed to detect selection.

Main Results:

  • The original model provides a foundation for understanding evolutionary dynamics.
  • Numerous subsequent methods have been developed to refine selection detection.
  • Assumptions within these models significantly impact results and interpretations.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding the interplay of mutation and selection is key to deciphering protein evolution.
  • The reviewed models offer valuable tools for molecular evolution research.
  • Critical evaluation of model assumptions is essential for accurate evolutionary inference.