Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Validated LC-MS/MS Panel for Quantifying 11 Drug-Resistant TB Medications in Small Hair Samples
Published on: May 19, 2020
Validation of the Oncomine™ focus panel for next-generation sequencing of clinical tumour samples
Hannah L Williams1,2,3, Kathy Walsh4, Austin Diamond5
1UKNEQAS for Molecular Genetics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. hlw37@st-andrews.ac.uk.
Abstract:
The clinical utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for a diverse range of targets is expanding, increasing the need for multiplexed analysis of both DNA and RNA. However, translation into daily use requires a rigorous and comprehensive validation strategy. The aim of this clinical validation was to assess the performance of the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (IonPGM™) and validate the Oncomine™ Focus DNA and RNA Fusion panels for clinical application in solid tumour testing of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. Using a mixture of routine FFPE and reference material across a variety of tissue and specimen types, we sequenced 86 and 31 samples on the Oncomine™ Focus DNA and RNA Fusion assays, respectively. This validation considered a number of parameters including the clinical robustness of the bioinformatics pipeline for variant detection and interpretation. The Oncomine™ Focus DNA assay had a sample and variant-based sensitivity of 99.1 and 97.1%, respectively, and an assay specificity of 100%. The Oncomine™ Focus Fusion panel had a good sensitivity and specificity based upon the samples assessed, however requires further validation to confirm findings due to limited sample numbers. We observed a good sequencing performance based upon amplicon, gene (hotspot variants within gene) and sample specific analysis with 92% of clinical samples obtaining an average amplicon coverage above 500X. Detection of some indels was challenging for the routine IonReporter™ workflow; however, the addition of NextGENe® software improved indel identification demonstrating the importance of both bench and bioinformatic validation. With an increasing number of clinically actionable targets requiring a variety of methodologies, NGS provides a cost-effective and time-saving methodology to assess multiple targets across different modalities. We suggest the use of multiple analysis software to ensure identification of clinically applicable variants.
Insights
This study validates the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine and Oncomine Focus panels for clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) of solid tumors. The DNA assay demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, crucial for reliable clinical variant detection in FFPE tissues.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Molecular Diagnostics
- Genomic Technologies
- Oncology
Background:
- Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly vital for multiplexed DNA and RNA analysis in clinical settings.
- Rigorous validation is essential for translating NGS technologies into routine clinical practice.
- Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are commonly used in solid tumor testing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To clinically validate the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (IonPGM) and Oncomine Focus DNA and RNA Fusion panels.
- To assess the performance of these panels for solid tumor testing using FFPE tissues.
- To evaluate the robustness of the bioinformatics pipeline for variant detection and interpretation.
Main Methods:
- Sequencing of 86 samples using the Oncomine Focus DNA assay and 31 samples using the Oncomine Focus RNA Fusion assay.
- Utilized a mix of routine FFPE and reference materials across diverse tissue and specimen types.
- Assessed performance parameters including sensitivity, specificity, and bioinformatics pipeline robustness.
Main Results:
- The Oncomine Focus DNA assay achieved 99.1% sample-based and 97.1% variant-based sensitivity, with 100% specificity.
- Good sequencing performance was observed, with 92% of clinical samples achieving >500X amplicon coverage.
- While the RNA Fusion panel showed good performance, further validation is needed due to limited sample numbers. The IonReporter workflow had challenges with indel detection, improved by NextGENe software.
Conclusions:
- The validated NGS panels are suitable for clinical application in solid tumor testing.
- The study highlights the importance of comprehensive bench and bioinformatic validation for NGS assays.
- Employing multiple analysis software tools is recommended to ensure the identification of clinically actionable variants.
Related Concept Videos
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
Reliability and Validity
Wood Panel Products
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Cis-regulatory Sequences

