Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interference and Diffraction02:18

Interference and Diffraction

52.5K
Interference is a characteristic phenomenon exhibited by waves. When two electromagnetic waves interact with their peaks and troughs coinciding, a resulting wave with enhanced amplitude is produced. This is known as constructive interference. In this case, the two waves interacting are in phase with each other.
52.5K
RNA Interference01:23

RNA Interference

28.1K
RNA interference (RNAi) is a process in which a small non-coding RNA molecule blocks the post-transcriptional expression of a gene by binding to its messenger RNA (mRNA) and preventing the protein from being translated.
This process occurs naturally in cells, often through the activity of genomically-encoded microRNAs. Researchers can take advantage of this mechanism by introducing synthetic RNAs to deactivate specific genes for research or therapeutic purposes. For example, RNAi could be used...
28.1K
Impact of Individuals on Individuals01:30

Impact of Individuals on Individuals

389
Human behavior is intricately shaped by social influences that arise from interactions with others in diverse contexts. These influences not only mold beliefs and attitudes but also drive the regulation of behaviors through both direct communication and observational learning. The study of these processes falls within the domain of social psychology, which seeks to understand how individuals are affected by and affect those around them.Mechanisms of Social InfluenceDirect social influence...
389
Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

477
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
477
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

8.0K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
8.0K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.7K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Estimating the Mean: Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Summary Representations for Time Intervals.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2025
Same author

Prior Knowledge Norms for Naming Country Outlines: An Open Stimulus Set.

Journal of cognition·2023
Same author

Second Chances in Learning: Does a Resit Prospect Lower Study-Time Investments on a First Test?

Journal of cognition·2022
Same author

FMTP: A unifying computational framework of temporal preparation across time scales.

Psychological review·2022
Same author

Change biases identify the features that drive time perception.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2021
Same author

Neural Repetition Suppression Modulates Time Perception: Evidence From Electrophysiology and Pupillometry.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2021
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.8K

Robustness of individual differences in temporal interference effects.

Nadine Schlichting1,2, Ritske de Jong1,2, Hedderik van Rijn1,2

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Plos One
|August 15, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Individual differences in how sensory information interferes with time perception are stable and reliably measured using Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE). This method helps isolate temporal processing in neuroimaging studies.

More Related Videos

Effective Oral RNA Interference RNAi Administration to Adult Anopheles gambiae Mosquitoes
07:48

Effective Oral RNA Interference RNAi Administration to Adult Anopheles gambiae Mosquitoes

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.8K
RNA Interference in Ticks
09:06

RNA Interference in Ticks

Published on: January 20, 2011

18.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.8K
Effective Oral RNA Interference RNAi Administration to Adult Anopheles gambiae Mosquitoes
07:48

Effective Oral RNA Interference RNAi Administration to Adult Anopheles gambiae Mosquitoes

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.8K
RNA Interference in Ticks
09:06

RNA Interference in Ticks

Published on: January 20, 2011

18.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics
  • Neuroimaging

Background:

  • Perceptual interference effects, where stimulus dimensions like numerosity affect duration perception, complicate the study of temporal processing.
  • Previous work utilized Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) to quantify temporal and numerical interference in time and numerosity judgments.
  • Understanding the reliability of MLE is crucial for its application in analyzing neuroimaging data and individual differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the reliability of the MLE procedure for estimating magnitude interference effects.
  • To investigate the stability of individual interference magnitudes across different sessions and task variations.
  • To determine if MLE estimates predict performance in related perceptual tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Re-administered a time-numerosity judgment task with EEG recording across two sessions one week apart.
  • Employed task variants manipulating the interfering dimension (numerosity) to probe specific influences on temporal processing.
  • Used Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) to quantify individual interference magnitudes and analyzed their stability and predictive power.

Main Results:

  • Individual interference magnitudes estimated via MLE demonstrated high stability between sessions and across different task variants.
  • MLE estimates from time-numerosity tasks predicted performance in a standard temporal judgment task, indicating stable individual traits.
  • MLE estimates did not predict performance in a numerical Stroop task, suggesting specificity in what is being measured.

Conclusions:

  • The MLE procedure is a reliable method for quantifying stable individual differences in magnitude interference effects.
  • This reliability supports the use of MLE in neuroimaging studies to isolate temporal processing from interfering dimensions.
  • The findings highlight the potential of MLE to characterize stable individual traits in perceptual decision-making.