Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
A Comparison of Image Quality Using Radial vs Femoral Approaches in Patients Undergoing Diagnostic Coronary
Wallace W K Chow, Rong Bing, Juliana Kanawati
1Cardiology Department, Concord Hospital, The University of Sydney, Hospital Road, Concord 2139, NSW, Australia. david.brieger@health.nsw.gov.au.
Insights
Radial access for coronary angiography yields poorer image quality and higher radiation doses compared to femoral access. These findings are crucial for selecting the optimal access method in patients undergoing diagnostic procedures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Radial access is increasingly used for diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG).
- Limited studies have compared image quality between radial and femoral approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare angiographic image quality and diagnostic value between radial and femoral access in CAG.
- To evaluate the proportion of non-diagnostic images and patient radiation dose for each access method.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 200 patients (100 radial, 100 femoral) undergoing CAG.
- Image quality assessed quantitatively by four experienced angiographers.
- Comparison of primary endpoint (image quality) and secondary endpoints (non-diagnostic images, radiation dose).
Main Results:
- Radial access resulted in significantly poorer image quality for the left coronary artery compared to femoral access (P<.01).
- A higher proportion of non-diagnostic images (3.23% vs 2.02%) and increased patient radiation doses (832.81 mGy vs 645.69 mGy) were observed with radial access.
- No significant difference in image quality was found for the right coronary artery between the two groups.
Conclusions:
- Radial access is associated with inferior angiographic image quality and higher radiation exposure than femoral access.
- Awareness of these limitations is vital for informed decision-making in selecting the access route for diagnostic CAG.
Introduction:
Radial access for diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG) has gained traction in recent years over the femoral artery approach, but difference in image quality has not been extensively studied. This study aims to compare image quality and diagnostic value in radial vs femoral access in patients undergoing invasive CAG.
Methods:
This is a retrospective study of 200 patients (100 radial and 100 femoral) undergoing CAG at an experienced center from 2014 to 2015. The primary endpoint was angiographic image quality, and secondary endpoints were proportion of non-diagnostic images and patient radiation dose. Image quality was assessed by four experienced angiographers using a quantitative scale. Mean differences in scores were compared as well as proportion of non-diagnostic images produced.
Results:
Radial access produced images that were significantly poorer than femoral access when viewing the left coronary artery (2.65 ± 0.04 vs 2.79 ± 0.03; P<.01). This difference remained significant after adjusting for age, gender, and catheter size (P=.04). There was no significant difference in image quality between the radial and femoral group when viewing the right coronary artery (2.91 ± 0.03 vs 2.84 ± 0.04; P=.11). There was a higher proportion of non-diagnostic images produced by radial access than femoral (3.23% vs 2.02%; P<.01) and radial access resulted in higher patient radiation doses (832.81 ± 49.59 mGy vs 645.69 ± 35.46 mGy; P<.01).
Conclusion:
Radial access produces poorer angiographic image quality and exposes patients to greater radiation compared to femoral access in contemporary practice. An awareness of these limitations is important when selecting mode of access in patients undergoing diagnostic CAG.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Radial System Protection
In a radial system with a fault downstream of the third breaker, ideally, only the third breaker will open, isolating the fault and interrupting the load connected beyond it. The second breaker has a longer delay setting,...
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
Coronary Circulation
Coronary circulation begins at the base of the aorta, where two main arteries arise—the left and right coronary arteries. These arteries encircle the heart in the coronary sulcus and supply the...
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation

