Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

07:55
Standard Operating Procedure for Lyssavirus Surveillance of the Bat Population in Taiwan
Published on: August 27, 2019
8.0K
A method for rapid testing of social learning in vampire bats.
Julia K Vrtilek1, Gerald G Carter2,3, Krista J Patriquin4
1Department of Biology, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Royal Society Open Science
|August 16, 2018
Summary
This study developed a quick maze test for social learning in common vampire bats. Trained bats helped naive bats learn to exit the maze, showing a promising method for future research.
Area of Science:
- Ethology
- Animal Behavior
- Behavioral Ecology
Background:
- Designing social learning experiments requires understanding species-specific behaviors.
- The common vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus) is a highly social species ideal for studying social learning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To pilot a rapid experimental procedure for assessing social learning in common vampire bats.
- To establish baseline performance data for naive bats in a novel maze task.
Main Methods:
- Trained adult vampire bats to navigate a 3D maze for colony reunion.
- Observed naive bats' maze navigation before, during, and after the introduction of trained demonstrators.
- Recorded exit rates and retention of learned behavior in naive bats.
Main Results:
- Naive bats showed increased maze exit rates in the presence of trained demonstrators.
- Demonstrator presence attracted naive bats' attention to the maze exit.
- Four out of five naive bats retained the ability to exit the maze independently after demonstrator exposure.
- No naive bats exited the maze without a demonstrator present.
Conclusions:
- The developed maze procedure is a promising and efficient method for testing social learning in vampire bats.
- Maze difficulty can be adjusted to modulate learning rates, allowing for flexible experimental design.
- Each trial is brief (15 minutes), facilitating rapid data collection and analysis.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
32.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.4K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
56.1K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
56.1K
Social Scripts
10.3K
People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter),...
10.3K
Social Traps
26.9K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
26.9K
Social Facilitation
36.6K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
36.6K
Social Loafing
39.7K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
39.7K

