Robustness and fragility of the susceptible-infected-susceptible epidemic models on complex networks

Wesley Cota1, Angélica S Mata2, Silvio C Ferreira1,3

  • 1Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-900 Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Physical Review. E
|August 17, 2018
PubMed

Insights

This study reveals that modified susceptible-infected-susceptible (SIS) epidemic models exhibit dual behaviors on networks. Depending on network properties, epidemic thresholds can change significantly or remain the same compared to standard SIS dynamics.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Network Science
  • Mathematical Biology

Background:

  • The standard susceptible-infected-susceptible (SIS) model is widely used to study epidemic dynamics.
  • Understanding how network structure influences epidemic spread is crucial for public health.
  • Previous models often assume simplified network properties, potentially limiting their real-world applicability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze two modified SIS epidemic models that retain key properties of spontaneous healing and degree-dependent infection capacity.
  • To investigate how network characteristics, specifically degree distribution, affect epidemic thresholds in these modified models compared to the standard SIS model.
  • To elucidate the observed dual scenario in epidemic threshold behavior through epidemic lifespan analysis on star graphs.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of two modified susceptible-infected-susceptible (SIS) dynamics on uncorrelated synthetic networks with power-law degree distributions.
  • Comparison of epidemic thresholds between modified SIS models and the standard SIS model across different exponent values (γ).
  • Investigation of epidemic activation and lifespan on star graphs and k-core decomposition to understand model duality.

Main Results:

  • Simulations show a dual scenario where modified SIS models' epidemic thresholds are either dramatically altered or unchanged depending on network properties.
  • For power-law networks with γ<5/2, SIS dynamics are robust, showing similar outcomes across models.
  • For γ>5/2, modified models show thresholds aligning better with heterogeneous mean-field theory, with significant differences for γ>3, including a finite threshold versus a vanishing one in the standard model.

Conclusions:

  • Modified SIS models exhibit a duality in epidemic threshold behavior contingent on network structure, unlike the standard SIS model.
  • The activation mechanism of epidemics differs significantly between standard and modified SIS models, especially for higher γ values.
  • Results highlight the importance of considering network heterogeneity and choosing appropriate theoretical approaches for realistic epidemic modeling.

Related Concept Videos

Magnetic Susceptibility and Permeability01:31

Magnetic Susceptibility and Permeability

In linear magnetic materials, like paramagnets and diamagnets, magnetization is proportional to the magnetic field intensity. The constant of proportionality, a dimensionless number, is called magnetic susceptibility. The value of the susceptibility depends on the type of material.
When diamagnetic materials are placed under an external magnetic field, the moments opposite to the field are induced. Hence, the susceptibility for diamagnets has a minimal negative value of 10-5–10-6. Since...
2.4K
Susceptibility, Permittivity and Dielectric Constant01:26

Susceptibility, Permittivity and Dielectric Constant

When placed in an external electric field, a dielectric material gets polarized. The charge density in the dielectric material is given by the sum of the bound and free charge densities, while the total charge density can also be written in terms of the total electric field. The bound charge density can be measured in terms of polarization, leading to the relationship between electric displacement and polarization.
2.9K
Protein Networks02:26

Protein Networks

An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
4.6K
Protein Networks02:26

Protein Networks

2.9K
Network Covalent Solids02:18

Network Covalent Solids

Network covalent solids contain a three-dimensional network of covalently bonded atoms as found in the crystal structures of nonmetals like diamond, graphite, silicon, and some covalent compounds, such as silicon dioxide (sand) and silicon carbide (carborundum, the abrasive on sandpaper). Many minerals have networks of covalent bonds.
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
16.2K
Protein Complex Assembly02:41

Protein Complex Assembly

Proteins can form homomeric complexes with another unit of the same protein or heteromeric complexes with different types.  Most protein complexes self-assemble spontaneously via ordered pathways, while some proteins need assembly factors that guide their proper assembly. Despite the crowded intracellular environment, proteins usually interact with their correct partners and form functional complexes.
Many viruses self-assemble into a fully functional unit using the infected host cell to...
16.8K