Caries-arresting effects of silver diamine fluoride and sodium fluoride on dentine caries lesions

To investigate the remineralising effect and bacterial growth inhibition of 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) solution and 5% sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish on artificial dentine caries lesions.

Demineralised dentine blocks were treated with SDF + NaF (Group 1), SDF (Group 2), NaF (Group 3) and water (Group 4) and subjected to a Streptococcus mutans biofilm challenge. Lesion depth, precipitates' characteristics and matrix (collagen)-to-mineral ratio were evaluated by micro-computer tomography (micro-CT), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), respectively. The biofilm kinetics, viability and topography were assessed by counts of colony forming units (CFUs), confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. Data were analysed by two-way ANOVA test.

The lesion depths of Groups 1-4 were 170 ± 28 μm, 160 ± 32 μm, 353 ± 38 μm and 449 ± 24 μm, respectively. The addition of NaF to SDF did not show better remineralisation than SDF (p = 0.491). Metallic silver and silver chloride were found in Groups 1 and 2. The amide I-to-hydrogen phosphate ratios of the four groups were 0.14 ± 0.02, 0.14 ± 0.01, 0.29 ± 0.05 and 0.49 ± 0.16, respectively, and the addition of NaF to SDF did not offer better protection against collagen exposure than SDF (p = 0.986). The Log₁₀ CFUs of Groups 1-4 were 5.75 ± 0.56, 4.49 ± 0.57, 6.55 ± 0.39 and 6.40 ± 0.38, respectively. The presence of NaF reduced the antibacterial effect of SDF (p < 0.001). The SEM and CLSM images supported the findings.

Application of SDF with or without NaF reduced the demineralisation of dentine caries, but SDF exerted stronger inhibition of biofilm growth than SDF with NaF.

NaF varnish affects the antibacterialeffects of SDF, the adjunctive application of SDF solution and NaF varnish is not recommended to arrest dentine caries in clinic.