Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

18.0K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
18.0K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

250
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
250
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

13.9K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.9K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.6K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.6K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

209
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
209
Classifying Matter by Composition03:35

Classifying Matter by Composition

90.7K
Matter: Pure Substances and Mixtures
According to its composition, the matter can be classified into two broad categories — pure substances and mixtures. 
A pure substance is a form of matter that has a constant composition throughout with uniform properties. For example, any sample of sucrose has the same composition and same physical properties, such as melting point, color, and sweetness, regardless of the source from which it is isolated. 
A mixture is composed of two or...
90.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Normalized peak distribution uniformity metrics for chromatographic evaluation.

Journal of chromatography. A·2026
Same author

Addressing method transfer and robustness challenges using design space modeling.

Journal of chromatography. A·2026
Same author

Optimized UHPLC-derivatization method for low-level nitrite detection in pharmaceutical excipients.

Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis·2026
Same author

Overcoming challenges in LC separation of oxysterols through guided design space modelling: A comparison of three stationary phases.

Journal of chromatography. A·2026
Same author

The Dynamic balances in HPLC: An unconventional application of temperature to optimize ionizable solute separations.

Journal of chromatography. A·2025
Same author

A universal separation quality factor (SQF) for evaluating liquid chromatographic separations.

Journal of chromatography. A·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Fabrication and Design of Wood-Based High-Performance Composites
08:08

Fabrication and Design of Wood-Based High-Performance Composites

Published on: November 9, 2019

14.0K

Simultaneous optimization of mobile phase composition and pH using retention modeling and experimental design.

Norbert Rácz1, Imre Molnár2, Arnold Zöldhegyi2

  • 1Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Budapest, Hungary.

Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
|August 17, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new method for optimizing liquid chromatography by modeling mobile phase effects. This approach enhances method robustness and reduces development time, crucial for complex analyses.

Keywords:
DryLabEarly-stage robustness calculationMobile phase effectsSoftware-assisted method developmentUHPLC, HPLC modeling

More Related Videos

Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box
14:23

Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box

Published on: June 9, 2023

1.6K
T-wave Ion Mobility-mass Spectrometry: Basic Experimental Procedures for Protein Complex Analysis
16:40

T-wave Ion Mobility-mass Spectrometry: Basic Experimental Procedures for Protein Complex Analysis

Published on: July 31, 2010

25.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Fabrication and Design of Wood-Based High-Performance Composites
08:08

Fabrication and Design of Wood-Based High-Performance Composites

Published on: November 9, 2019

14.0K
Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box
14:23

Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box

Published on: June 9, 2023

1.6K
T-wave Ion Mobility-mass Spectrometry: Basic Experimental Procedures for Protein Complex Analysis
16:40

T-wave Ion Mobility-mass Spectrometry: Basic Experimental Procedures for Protein Complex Analysis

Published on: July 31, 2010

25.3K

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Chromatography
  • Method Development

Background:

  • Liquid chromatography (LC) analysis faces increasing challenges due to complex samples and stringent regulatory demands.
  • Faster LC systems are prevalent, yet robust method development requires careful consideration of mobile phase parameters.
  • Mobile phase influences are critical for selectivity tuning and mitigating robustness issues throughout a method's lifecycle.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of mobile phase composition on selectivity in liquid chromatography method development.
  • To mitigate mobile phase-related robustness issues across the entire method lifecycle.
  • To demonstrate a new modeling approach for efficient and robust LC method development.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a new module in chromatographic modeling software (DryLab) for simultaneous optimization of gradient time, ternary eluent composition, and pH.
  • Employed a special design of experiments (DoE) requiring 18 input experiments for model creation.
  • Used a UPLC system with a narrow bore column (50 × 2.1 mm) for rapid model generation (2-3 hours).

Main Results:

  • Achieved excellent agreement between predicted and experimental results, with average retention time deviations under 1 second.
  • Demonstrated the applicability of the new design using amlodipine and its related impurities in a case study.
  • Performed in silico robustness testing to identify critical mobile phase and instrument parameters affecting method performance.

Conclusions:

  • The new modeling approach effectively optimizes mobile phase parameters for robust LC method development.
  • In silico robustness testing can be extensively used early in the Method Life Cycle (MLC) to evaluate method reliability.
  • This strategy significantly reduces development time and improves the overall robustness of chromatographic methods.