Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Using machine-learning approaches to predict non-participation in a nationwide general health check-up scheme
Akihiro Shimoda1, Daisuke Ichikawa1, Hiroshi Oyama2
1Department of Clinical Information Engineering, Division of Social Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Background:
In the time since the launch of a nationwide general health check-up and instruction program in Japan in 2008, interest in the formulation of an effective and efficient strategy to improve the participation rate has been growing. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate models identifying those who are unlikely to undergo general health check-ups. We used machine-learning methods to select interventional targets more efficiently.
Methods:
We used information from a local government database of Japan. The study population included 7290 individuals aged 40-74 years who underwent at least one general health check-up between 2012 and 2015. We developed four predictive models based on the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), support vector machines (SVMs), and logistic regression (LR) algorithms, using machine-learning techniques, and compared the areas under the curves (AUCs) of the models with those of the heuristic method (which presumes that the individuals who underwent a general health check-up in the previous year will do so again in the following year).
Results:
The AUCs for the XGBoost, RF, SVMs, LR, and heuristic models/method were 0.829 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.806-0.853), 0.821 (95% CI: 0.797-0.845), 0.812 (95% CI: 0.787-0.837), 0.816 (95% CI: 0.791-0.841), and 0.683 (95% CI: 0.657-0.708), respectively. XGBoost model exhibited the best AUC, and the performance was significantly better than that of SVMs (p = 0.034), LR (p = 0.017), and heuristic method (p < 0.001). However, the performance of XGBoost did not differ significantly from that of RF (p = 0.229).
Conclusion:
Predictive models using machine-learning techniques outperformed the existing heuristic method when used to predict participation in a general health check-up system by eligible participants.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
Related Concept Videos
The Z-Scheme of Electron Transport in Photosynthesis
Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Machines
A free-body diagram of the...
Machines: Problem Solving II
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.