Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
Published on: June 7, 2018
Trace metal behavior during in-situ iron removal tests in Leuven, Belgium
Alexander Vandenbohede1, Ilka Wallis2, Tine Alleman1
1De Watergroep, Vooruitgangstraat 189, 1030 Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract:
Subsurface iron removal (SIR) is an in-situ technique to lower the iron content of extracted groundwater. Through cyclic injection of oxygenated water ferrous iron oxidises and precipitates as iron hydroxide in a zone surrounding the extraction well, enhancing the sorptive capacity of the aquifer. During subsequent pumping phases, groundwater traverses the oxidation zone and ferrous iron sorbs to available and newly formed exchange and sorption sites, thereby retarding the breakthrough of dissolved iron. The process is well-understood in regards to the retardation of iron. Less well understood, however, is the behavior of a number of trace metals and metalloids during SIR operations, foremost arsenic (As). In this study, we analyse major and minor ion and trace metal concentrations from a number of SIR tests in a sand aquifer near Leuven, Belgium. We use reactive transport modelling to evaluate conceptual models of trace metal release and arrest. The test data, underpinned by model results, show that metal release, namely arsenic and barium (Ba), occurs through the oxidation of trace amounts of sulphide minerals during the injection phase. Sorption through cation exchange retards Ba while complexation lowers dissolved As concentrations. Arsenic is mobilized again during the pumping phase through varying phosphate concentrations in the native groundwater, despite available sorption surfaces, while Ba remains adsorbed. Concentrations, however, remain below WHO guideline values for As and Ba (10 μg/l and 0.7 mg/l), respectively. The developed conceptual model of As fate reveals a high propensity for As mobility during SIR due to desorption reactions and delivers an explanation as to why many SIR operations fail to show substantial As removal, despite efficient iron removal. Other monitored trace elements showed no mobilisation, including Zn, Al, Cd, Cr, Cu, F, Hg, Ni, Pb, Sb and Se.
More Related Videos
06:52Experimental Column Setup for Studying Anaerobic Biogeochemical Interactions Between Iron OxyHydroxides, Trace Elements, and Bacteria
Published on: December 19, 2017
08:45Quantitating Iron Transport Across the Mouse Placenta In Vivo Using Nonradioactive Iron Isotopes
Published on: May 10, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Bonding in Metals
Metallic Solids
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability....
Alkali Metals
Table 1: Properties of the alkali metals
Properties of Transition Metals
What is Behavior?