Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Comparative Lesions Analysis Through a Targeted Sequencing Approach
Published on: November 5, 2019
Angiographic late lumen loss revisited: impact on long-term target lesion revascularization
Taku Asano1,2, Patrick W Serruys3, Carlos Collet1,4
1Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Insights
Late lumen loss (LLL) values in coronary device trials are very low. A late lumen loss greater than 0.50 mm significantly predicts target lesion revascularization, but lower values do not. This suggests LLL may not be a useful metric for comparing modern devices.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular research
- Interventional cardiology
- Medical device technology
Background:
- Angiographic late lumen loss (LLL) values in contemporary coronary device trials are exceptionally low.
- The relationship between LLL and clinical outcomes, such as target lesion revascularization (TLR), requires recent re-evaluation.
- Assessing the predictive value of LLL for TLR is crucial for understanding device performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of late lumen loss (LLL) on target lesion revascularization (TLR).
- To analyze the relationship between LLL and TLR using both patient-level and study-level data from contemporary coronary devices.
- To re-evaluate the clinical significance of LLL in the era of advanced drug-eluting stents (DES).
Main Methods:
- A patient-level meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials (2426 patients) using first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES).
- A study-level meta-analysis of 40 studies (19,199 patients) involving CE-marked DES.
- Statistical analyses included probability regression, Cox proportional hazard models, and meta-regression to assess the association between LLL and TLR incidence.
Main Results:
- A patient-level analysis revealed an exponential relationship between in-stent LLL and the 2-year incidence of TLR.
- The optimal cut-off for predicting 2-year TLR was an LLL >0.50 mm.
- LLL >0.50 mm was independently associated with increased TLR up to 4 years (adjusted HR 6.62).
- Pooled mean LLL in DES studies was 0.23 mm, with moderate correlation between LLL >0.50 mm and TLR incidence at 1 and 5 years.
Conclusions:
- An angiographic late lumen loss (LLL) threshold of 0.50 mm is critical for predicting target lesion revascularization (TLR).
- LLL values below 0.50 mm are not predictive of TLR incidence.
- Low LLL in current device trials may limit its utility as a discriminating parameter for comparative device evaluation.
Aim:
In current device trials, the values of angiographic late lumen loss (LLL) have become extremely low and the relationship between LLL and clinical endpoints has not been recently re-evaluated. The impact of LLL on target lesion revascularization (TLR) in a patient- and study-level analysis of contemporary coronary devices was investigated.
Methods And Results:
We performed a patient-level meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials including 2426 patients treated with first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) and a study-level meta-analysis of 40 studies including 19 199 patients treated with CE-marked DES. In the patient-level analysis, the probability regression curve showed an exponential relationship between in-stent LLL and 2-year incidence of TLR. The optimal cut-off value of LLL based on Youden's index for 2-year TLR event was 0.50 mm. In the Cox proportional hazard model, LLL >0.50 mm was independently associated with an increased incidence of TLR up to 4 years after angiographic follow-up {adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 6.62 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 4.67-9.39], P < 0.001}. In the meta-regression analysis of the DES studies, pooled mean value of LLL was as low as 0.23 mm (95% CI 0.20-0.26), and there was a moderate correlation between the 1- and 5-year incidence of TLR and the percentage of the lesions with LLL >0.50 mm (R2 = 0.44, P < 0.001 at 1 year, R2 = 0.40, P < 0.001 at 5 years).
Conclusion:
An angiographic LLL ≤0.50 mm was not predictive of the incidence of TLR whereas a LLL >0.50 mm was. Low LLL in contemporary device trials may not be a sufficiently discriminating parameter for the comparative evaluation of devices.
More Related Videos
11:37Using Sniper-Cas9 to Minimize Off-target Effects of CRISPR-Cas9 Without the Loss of On-target Activity Via Directed Evolution
Published on: February 26, 2019
06:40Mouse Fetal Liver Culture System to Dissect Target Gene Functions at the Early and Late Stages of Terminal Erythropoiesis
Published on: September 9, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Line Loss
Line loss impacts power delivery efficiency in a balanced three-phase circuit. The symmetry in such a circuit simplifies the...
Reducing Line Loss
With a step-up transformer at the source, the voltage is increased, thereby reducing the current in the transmission lines since power loss in...
Impact of Groups on Groups
Long-term Depression
Energy Losses in Transformers
There are four main reasons for energy losses in transformers.
The first cause can be the high resistance of the...
Major Losses in Pipes
Fluid flow can be classified as laminar or turbulent, primarily based on the Reynolds number. This dimensionless number reflects the relative influence of inertial to viscous...