Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Skeletal Phenotype Analysis of a Conditional Stat3 Deletion Mouse Model
Published on: July 3, 2020
PRRT2-related phenotypes in patients with a 16p11.2 deletion
Danique R M Vlaskamp1, Petra M C Callenbach2, Patrick Rump3
1University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Neurology, Groningen, The Netherlands; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Insights
Genetic variants in PRRT2 are linked to benign infantile epilepsy (BIE) and paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia (PKD). However, the study found these conditions are less common with 16p11.2 deletions than PRRT2 variants, impacting genetic counseling.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Neurology
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Benign infantile epilepsy (BIE), paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia (PKD), and PKD with infantile convulsions (PKD/IC) are associated with PRRT2 gene variants.
- The 16p11.2 deletion, which can include PRRT2, and PRRT2 sequence variants are both loss-of-function mechanisms.
- Understanding the penetrance of these phenotypes in relation to genetic alterations is crucial for accurate diagnosis and counseling.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prevalence of BIE, PKD, and PKD/IC in patients with a 16p11.2 deletion encompassing PRRT2 or with a PRRT2 loss-of-function sequence variant.
- To compare the clinical presentation and ascertainment bias between these two genetic groups.
- To clarify the implications for genetic counseling when PRRT2-related phenotypes are not evident despite variant detection.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective evaluation of BIE, PKD, and PKD/IC using questionnaires and medical records in index patients from seven Dutch university hospitals.
- Inclusion of 33 patients with a 16p11.2 deletion and 12 patients with a PRRT2 sequence variant.
- Analysis of genetic testing indications and phenotype prevalence within each group.
Main Results:
- Nine percent of patients with a 16p11.2 deletion had BIE; none had PKD or PKD/IC.
- Patients with a PRRT2 sequence variant showed higher prevalence of BIE (p=0.069), PKD (p<0.001), and PKD/IC (p=0.067).
- Ascertainment bias was observed, with deletions often identified due to developmental issues and variants due to movement disorders or epilepsy.
Conclusions:
- BIE, PKD, and PKD/IC exhibit incomplete penetrance in individuals with 16p11.2 deletions.
- The study suggests ascertainment differences may overestimate the frequency of these phenotypes in PRRT2 variant carriers.
- Accurate genetic counseling is essential when genome-wide sequencing reveals variants in patients without classic PRRT2-related phenotypes.
Abstract:
We studied the presence of benign infantile epilepsy (BIE), paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia (PKD), and PKD with infantile convulsions (PKD/IC) in patients with a 16p11.2 deletion including PRRT2 or with a PRRT2 loss-of-function sequence variant. Index patients were recruited from seven Dutch university hospitals. The presence of BIE, PKD and PKD/IC was retrospectively evaluated using questionnaires and medical records. We included 33 patients with a 16p11.2 deletion: three (9%) had BIE, none had PKD or PKD/IC. Twelve patients had a PRRT2 sequence variant: BIE was present in four (p = 0.069), PKD in six (p < 0.001) and PKD/IC in two (p = 0.067). Most patients with a deletion had undergone genetic testing because of developmental problems (87%), whereas all patients with a sequence variant were tested because of a movement disorder (55%) or epilepsy (45%). BIE, PKD and PKD/IC clearly showed incomplete penetrance in patients with 16p11.2 deletions, but were found in all and 95% of patients with a PRRT2 sequence variant in our study and a large literature cohort, respectively. Deletions and sequence variants have the same underlying loss-of-function disease mechanism. Thus, differences in ascertainment have led to overestimating the frequency of BIE, PKD and PKD/IC in patients with a PRRT2 sequence variant. This has important implications for counseling if genome-wide sequencing shows such variants in patients not presenting the PRRT2-related phenotypes.
Related Concept Videos
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Patient-centered Care
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion

