Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

3D-Neuronavigation In Vivo Through a Patient's Brain During a Spontaneous Migraine Headache
Published on: June 2, 2014
A Qualitative Study On Patients With Chronic Migraine With Medication Overuse Headache: Comparing Frequent And
Chiara Scaratti1, Venusia Covelli2, Erika Guastafierro1
1Public Health and Disability Unit, Neurological Institute "C. Besta" IRCCS Foundation, Neurology, Milan, Italy.
Background:
It is common clinical experience that, after structured withdrawal, some patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse headache (CM with MOH) are more prone than others to relapse and to be in need of further structured treatments. Our aim was to explore similarities and differences between frequent relapsers (FRs) and non-frequent relapsers (NFRs) by considering their point of view, perceptions, and perspective of their subjective experience with relapse into CM with MOH.
Methods:
Patients were consecutively recruited on occasion of a structured withdrawal treatment and were interviewed individually about their headache experience and their perspectives on relapse into CM with MOH. We considered FR those patients requiring 2 or more structured withdrawals for MOH within 3 years. A narrative approach with no preconceived coding schemes was employed. To facilitate coding, categorization and organization of data the software QRS NVivo 11.0 was used: themes were defined as common to FR and NFR, or peculiar (by frequency or content) to one of the 2 groups.
Results:
Sixteen patients (13 women; mean age of 53) were interviewed: 7 were classified as FRs. A total of 22 themes emerged from 552 single quotations (the 10 most relevant covered 82% of the entire body of quotations). Four themes were commonly reported by both FR and NFR patients, and 6 were peculiar to one group only. Common aspects included issues connected to the dilemma between disclosing, concealing and the feelings of isolation around MOH, the idea of being addicted to medication, presence of anxiety, and the attempt to use non-pharmacological therapies as an alternative to medication. Peculiar aspects included causal attribution (FRs attributed headache to uncontrollable factors); future expectations at the time point of withdrawal (FRs were generally resigned); high-performance functioning (FRs believed they are "forced" to reach high levels of performance as a consequence of others' inability); coping strategies (FRs tended to "passively accept" problems and showed avoidance-related behaviors). Moreover, FRs were less frequently aware of their problems and described more frequently depressive symptoms.
Conclusions:
Our results highlight that some differences between FR and NFR patients with CM and MOH exist. Frequent relapsers among patients with CM and MOH reported some important peculiarities of the lived experience of having chronic migraine; clinicians should recognize these psychosocial aspects such as social relationships, future expectations, the experience of illness, medication management, and how the withdrawal experience is regarded, as they may be associated with frequent relapse into MOH.
Insights
Patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse headache (CM with MOH) who frequently relapse often attribute headaches to uncontrollable factors and exhibit passive coping mechanisms. Understanding these psychosocial factors is crucial for effective treatment and preventing recurrent headaches.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Psychiatry
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Some patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse headache (CM with MOH) frequently relapse after structured withdrawal treatments.
- Understanding the subjective experiences and perspectives of frequent relapsers (FRs) versus non-frequent relapsers (NFRs) is essential for improving treatment outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the similarities and differences in the lived experiences of patients with CM with MOH who are frequent relapsers (FRs) compared to non-frequent relapsers (NFRs).
- To identify unique psychosocial factors associated with frequent relapse in CM with MOH.
Main Methods:
- Individual interviews were conducted with patients undergoing structured withdrawal treatment for MOH.
- A narrative approach was used to analyze patient perspectives on headache experience and relapse.
- Patients were classified as FRs if they required two or more structured withdrawals for MOH within three years.
Main Results:
- Four common themes and six peculiar themes emerged from the interviews.
- Frequent relapsers (FRs) attributed headaches to uncontrollable factors, expressed resignation about future expectations, felt compelled to achieve high performance, and employed passive coping strategies with avoidance behaviors.
- FRs demonstrated less awareness of their problems and reported more depressive symptoms compared to NFRs.
Conclusions:
- Significant psychosocial differences exist between frequent relapsers (FRs) and non-frequent relapsers (NFRs) with CM and MOH.
- Clinicians should consider psychosocial aspects such as social relationships, future expectations, illness perception, medication management, and withdrawal experiences to address frequent relapse in CM with MOH.
Related Concept Videos
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Qualitative Analysis
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
Inhaled Medications
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Case Studies

