Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Coral Reef Arks: An In Situ Mesocosm and Toolkit for Assembling Reef Communities
Published on: January 6, 2023
Repeatability of ARK-30 in a pediatric population
Laura Hernandez-Moreno1, Ana Vallelado-Alvarez2, Raul Martin3
1Optometry Research Group, IOBA Eye Institute, School of Optometry, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain; Vision Rehabilitation Lab, Department of Physics and Optometry, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Insights
The ARK-30 handheld autorefractor shows poor repeatability without cycloplegia in children. With cycloplegia, it offers better agreement with retinoscopy for refractive error estimation but doesn't replace it.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Optometry
- Pediatric Eye Care
Background:
- Accurate refractive error assessment is crucial for pediatric eye care.
- Handheld autorefractors offer potential for portable vision screening.
- Evaluating the accuracy and repeatability of devices like the ARK-30 is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the repeatability and agreement of the ARK-30 handheld autorefractor compared to retinoscopy.
- To evaluate performance under both cycloplegic and noncycloplegic conditions in children.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional, masked study involving 30 children (mean age 6.7 years).
- Three consecutive measurements using the ARK-30 (with and without cycloplegia) and retinoscopy were performed.
- Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare measurements in conventional and vector notations.
Main Results:
- ARK-30 measurements without cycloplegia showed lower values and statistically significant differences from retinoscopy.
- Repeatability was significantly better under cycloplegic conditions (Sph LoA: -0.66 to +0.69 D, SE LoA: -0.66 to +0.65 D) compared to noncycloplegic conditions.
- Cycloplegic autorefraction measures were not statistically different from retinoscopy measures.
Conclusions:
- The ARK-30 exhibits low repeatability and a tendency towards minus overcorrection in children without cycloplegia.
- While cycloplegia improves ARK-30's repeatability and agreement with retinoscopy, it remains an estimation tool, not a substitute for gold standard retinoscopy.
Purpose:
To determine repeatability and agreement of the ARK-30 handheld autorefractor with retinoscopy under cycloplegic and noncycloplegic conditions in children.
Methods:
Three consecutive autorefractor measurements (with and without cycloplegia) and retinoscopy were performed and compared in 30 randomized eyes of 30 children (mean age of 6.7 ± 2.7 years with spherical equivalent [SE] refraction from ‒4.01 to +7.38 D) in a cross-section and masked study. Bland-Altman analysis of autorefractor measurements (with and without cycloplegia) and agreement with retinoscopy were calculated with conventional notation (sphere [Sph] and cylinder [Cyl]) and vector notation (SE, J0, and J45coefficients).
Results:
ARK-30 measurements without cycloplegia were lower than under cycloplegic conditions (Sph: ‒0.52 ± 2.37 D vs + 0.86 ± 2.60 D, P < 0.01; Cyl: ‒0.83 ± 0.80 D versus ‒0.78 ± 0.77 D, P = 0.37; and SE: ‒0.94 ± 2.19 D vs + 0.47 ± 2.44 D, P < 0.01, respectively) and statistically different (P < 0.03) from retinoscopy (Shp: +0.83 ± 2.66 D; Cyl: ‒0.71 ± 0.87 D; SE: +0.51 ± 2.49 D). Without statistical differences were in J0and J45coefficients. Cyloplegic autorefraction measures were not found to be statistically significantly different to retinoscopy measures. ARK-30 under cycloplegia shows better repeatability with lower limits of agreement (LoA) in Sph (LoA: ‒0.66 to +0.69 D), and SE (LoA: ‒0.66 to +0.65 D) than without cycloplegia (LoA: ‒1.45 to +1.77 D, and ‒1.38 to +1.74 D, respectively).
Conclusion:
Under noncycloplegic conditions, ARK-30 autorefractor has low repeatability and a tendency toward minus over correction in children. However, repeatability and agreement with retinoscopy under cycloplegic conditions allow use of ARK-30 in children to estimate refraction but not to substitute gold standard retinoscopic refraction.
Related Concept Videos
What is Population Genetics?
Conservation of Small Populations
Population Growth
What are Populations and Communities?
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution

