Fluid resuscitation of hypotensive emergency patients with and without an algorithm

Seventy-seven consecutive hypotensive (mean arterial pressure (MAP) less than 80 mmHg) surgical emergency patients were resuscitated according to either physicians' individual orders (38 patients) or an algorithm (39 patients). The shock was mainly caused by accidental injuries or acute gastrointestinal bleeding. The patients of the algorithm group were given more plasma expanders than the patients of the control group, while the total amount of fluids administered was similar in both groups. The primary goal of the resuscitation (MAP greater than 80 mmHg) was reached within 30 min in three cases in the control group and in seven cases in the algorithm group. The treatment times at the emergency department and the intensive care unit were similar for the groups. The number of severe and moderate pulmonary disturbances was the same, but mild disturbances were significantly more common in the control group. Renal failure was somewhat more common in the control group and the renal function disturbances were significantly more severe among the control patients. The results suggest that the physicians in some extent altered their practices in fluid resuscitation when the algorithm was put to use, and that this change, perhaps, produced the somewhat better outcome of the patients. The authors recommend the algorithm to be used as a basis of shock treatment and particularly in those emergency departments where the resuscitation of hypotensive patients is performed by junior or inexperienced physicians.