Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
Published on: April 17, 2012
Stereotactic radiosurgery for hypervascular intracranial tumors
Cheng-Chia Lee1,2, Chun-Lung Chou3, Ching-Jen Chen4
1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, 17F, No. 201, Shih-Pai Road, Sec. 2, Beitou, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan, ROC. yfnaughty@gmail.com.
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) effectively treats central neurocytomas, cavernous sinus hemangiomas, and glomus tumors, achieving high tumor regression rates. Upfront SRS showed similar efficacy to adjuvant SRS with minimal complications.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Radiation Oncology
- Oncology
Background:
- Hypervascular tumors like central neurocytomas (CNCs), cavernous sinus hemangiomas (CSHs), and glomus tumors (GTs) pose treatment challenges.
- Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an option for managing these complex lesions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety and efficacy of SRS for CNCs, CSHs, and GTs.
- To compare upfront SRS versus adjuvant SRS in treating these hypervascular tumors.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 60 hypervascular tumors (28 CNCs, 16 CSHs, 16 GTs) treated with SRS between 1993 and 2017.
- Tumor response evaluated via volumetric magnetic resonance imaging analysis.
- Categorization of tumor response: regression (>10% decrease), stable (≤10% change), or progression (>10% increase) in tumor volume (TV).
Main Results:
- 90% of tumors showed regression after initial SRS, with significant relative TV reductions observed over time for all tumor types.
- CSHs demonstrated the most substantial volume reduction (88% at 48 months), followed by CNCs (73% at 48 months) and GTs (47% at 48 months).
- Upfront SRS (43% of cases) yielded comparable TV reductions to adjuvant SRS, with only five patients experiencing adverse radiation effects and no mortality.
Conclusions:
- SRS is a safe and effective treatment for hypervascular tumors, achieving high regression rates and low complication risks.
- No significant difference in tumor volume reduction was observed between upfront and adjuvant SRS strategies.
- Upfront SRS can be considered a viable treatment option for select patients with these tumors.
More Related Videos
10:52Stereotactic Intracranial Implantation and In vivo Bioluminescent Imaging of Tumor Xenografts in a Mouse Model System of Glioblastoma Multiforme
Published on: September 25, 2012
12:09A Novel High-resolution In vivo Imaging Technique to Study the Dynamic Response of Intracranial Structures to Tumor Growth and Therapeutics
Published on: June 16, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
The Tumor Microenvironment
Cancer Stem Cells and Tumor Maintenance
Cancer stem cells are thought to originate from tissue-specific normal stem cells or progenitor cells. The normal stem cells usually reside in...
Loss of Tumor Suppressor Gene Functions
When the tumor suppressor genes develop mutations or are lost, cells start growing out of control, leading to cancer. However, a single functional copy of the tumor suppressor gene is enough for the cells to maintain their normal functions and cell...