Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

An In Ovo Model for Testing Insulin-mimetic Compounds
Published on: April 23, 2018
The appearance of mimetic Heliconius butterflies to predators and conspecifics
Denise Dalbosco Dell'Aglio1,2, Jolyon Troscianko3, W Owen McMillan2
1Butterfly Genetics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Adaptive coloration is under conflicting selection pressures: choosing potential mates and warning signaling against visually guided predators. Different elements of the color signal may therefore be tuned by evolution for different functions. We investigated how mimicry in four pairs of Heliconius comimics is potentially seen both from the perspective of butterflies and birds. Visual sensitivities of eight candidate avian predators were predicted through genetic analysis of their opsin genes. Using digital image color analysis, combined with bird and butterfly visual system models, we explored how predators and conspecifics may visualize mimetic patterns. Ultraviolet vision (UVS) birds are able to discriminate between the yellow and white colors of comimics better than violet vision (VS) birds. For Heliconius vision, males and females differ in their ability to discriminate comimics. Female vision and red filtering pigments have a significant effect on the perception of the yellow forewing band and the red ventral forewing pattern. A behavioral experiment showed that UV cues are used in mating behavior; removal of such cues was associated with an increased tendency to approach comimics as compared to conspecifics. We have therefore shown that visual signals can act to both reduce the cost of confusion in courtship and maintain the advantages of mimicry.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
Brick Durability, Strength, and Appearance
Frequency-dependent Selection
Impression Management Techniques I: Managing Appearances
Keystone Species
Symbiosis

