Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random-effects meta-analysis
Areti Angeliki Veroniki1,2, Dan Jackson3, Ralf Bender4
1Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract:
Meta-analyses are an important tool within systematic reviews to estimate the overall effect size and its confidence interval for an outcome of interest. If heterogeneity between the results of the relevant studies is anticipated, then a random-effects model is often preferred for analysis. In this model, a prediction interval for the true effect in a new study also provides additional useful information. However, the DerSimonian and Laird method-frequently used as the default method for meta-analyses with random effects-has been long challenged due to its unfavorable statistical properties. Several alternative methods have been proposed that may have better statistical properties in specific scenarios. In this paper, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of available methods for calculating point estimates, confidence intervals, and prediction intervals for the overall effect size under the random-effects model. We indicate whether some methods are preferable than others by considering the results of comparative simulation and real-life data studies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Sample Size Calculation
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
The Uncertainty Principle
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Random Sampling Method
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

