Lifecycle Comparison of Mainstream Anaerobic Baffled Reactor and Conventional Activated Sludge Systems for Domestic...

The objective of this study was to evaluate the lifecycle impacts of anaerobic primary treatment of domestic wastewater using anaerobic baffled reactors (ABRs) coupled with aerobic secondary treatment relative to conventional wastewater and sludge/biosolids treatment systems through the application of wastewater treatment modeling and three lifecycle-based analyses: environmental lifecycle assessment, net energy balance, and lifecycle costing. Data from two pilot-scale ABRs operated under ambient wastewater temperatures were used to model the anaerobic primary treatment process. To address uncertain parameters in the scale-up of pilot-scale anaerobic reactor data, uncertainty analysis and Monte Carlo simulation were employed. This study demonstrates that anaerobic primary treatment of domestic wastewater using ABRs can be incorporated with existing aerobic treatment strategies to reduce aeration demand, reduce sludge production, and increase energy generation. The net result of coupling anaerobic primary treatment with aerobic secondary treatment is a more favorable net energy balance, reduced environmental impacts in most examined categories, and lower lifecycle costs relative to conventional treatment configurations; however, the removal and/or capture of dissolved methane is required to reduce global warming impacts and increase on-site energy generation. With further study, anaerobic primary treatment can be a path forward for energy-positive wastewater treatment.