Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

365
Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
365
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods01:08

Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods

618
Renal clearance is a critical parameter encompassing kidney filtration, secretion, and reabsorption processes. It is calculated using a specific equation to determine the rate at which the kidneys clear a drug.
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
618
The Auditory Ossicles01:11

The Auditory Ossicles

3.2K
The auditory ossicles of the middle ear transmit sounds from the air as vibrations to the fluid-filled cochlea. The auditory ossicles consist of two malleus (hammer) bones, two incus (anvil) bones, and two stapes (stirrups), one on each side. These bones develop during the fetal stage and are the ones to ossify first. They are fully mature at birth and do not grow afterward.
The aptly named stapes look very much like a stirrup. The three ossicles are unique to mammals, and each plays a role in...
3.2K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison02:57

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

56.1K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
56.1K
Auditory Pathway01:15

Auditory Pathway

7.4K
Auditory pathways constitute the complex neural circuits responsible for transmitting and interpreting auditory information from the peripheral auditory system to the brain. Sound waves are initially captured by the outer ear, funneled through the ear canal, and reach the tympanic membrane (eardrum). These vibrations are transmitted via the middle ear's ossicles to the inner ear's cochlea.
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking...
7.4K
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

1.1K
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cochlear aging after synaptopathic noise: age-noise interactions in hair cell loss and axonal degeneration.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Spatial Filters-In Search of the Virtual Electrode.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

An efficient continuous-tone procedure for the study of frequency discrimination.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same author

BOLD fMRI responses to amplitude-modulated sounds across age in adult listeners.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Exploring an EM-algorithm for banded regression in computational neuroscience.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Neural processing of goal and non-goal-directed movements on the smartphone.

Neuroimage. Reports·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

15.2K

A Comparison of Regularization Methods in Forward and Backward Models for Auditory Attention Decoding.

Daniel D E Wong1,2, Søren A Fuglsang3, Jens Hjortkjær3,4

  • 1Laboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, CNRS, UMR 8248, Paris, France.

Frontiers in Neuroscience
|August 23, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Comparing methods for decoding auditory attention from EEG data, this study found that backward models, which decode attended speech from brain activity, benefit from regularization for improved accuracy. Forward models showed no improvement with regularization.

Keywords:
attention decodingelectroencephalographyselective auditory attentionspeech decodingtemporal response function

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.5K
Optogenetic Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve
10:53

Optogenetic Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve

Published on: October 8, 2014

15.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

15.2K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.5K
Optogenetic Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve
10:53

Optogenetic Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve

Published on: October 8, 2014

15.1K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Decoding selective auditory attention from electroencephalogram (EEG) is crucial for brain-computer interfaces and auditory perception research.
  • Current methods rely on linear mappings (forward/backward models) between sound features and EEG responses.
  • Model performance depends on parameter estimation, with no standardized comparison of methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comparatively evaluate different EEG-EEG model estimation methods for classifying attended speakers.
  • To assess the impact of regularization on model performance in decoding auditory attention.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study of various model estimation techniques was conducted.
  • Multi-channel EEG data from 18 subjects listening to speech mixtures were used.
  • Performance was evaluated using regression and classification metrics.

Main Results:

  • Regularized forward models (predicting EEG from audio) did not enhance regression or classification accuracy.
  • Regularized backward models (decoding speech from EEG) significantly improved both regression and classification accuracies.

Conclusions:

  • Backward models with regularization offer superior performance for decoding attended speech from EEG.
  • This finding advances the development of more effective brain-computer interfaces for auditory attention.