Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Acute Kidney Injury Model Induced by Cisplatin in Adult Zebrafish
Published on: May 15, 2021
Preventing contrast medium-induced acute kidney injury : Side-by-side comparison of Swedish-ESUR guidelines
Ulf Nyman1, Joanna Ahlkvist2, Peter Aspelin3
1Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Medical Radiology, University of Lund, Malmö, Sweden. ulf.nyman@bredband.net.
Insights
The Swedish Society of Uroradiology (SSUR) offers more cautious guidelines for contrast medium-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) than the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR), due to insufficient evidence. SSUR emphasizes absolute GFR and iodine dose/GFR ratios for patient safety.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Nephrology
- Urology
Background:
- Contrast medium-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a significant concern in radiological procedures.
- Existing guidelines from different societies may present variations in risk assessment and management strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a side-by-side comparison of updated CI-AKI guidelines from the Swedish Society of Uroradiology (SSUR) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR).
- To highlight key discrepancies in risk factor thresholds, medication management, and dosing recommendations between the two societies.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of the SSUR and ESUR guidelines on CI-AKI.
- Identification and tabulation of major differences in recommended glomerular filtration rate (GFR) thresholds, consideration of comorbidities, and management of nephrotoxic medications.
- Evaluation of differing approaches to contrast media (CM) dosing and GFR normalization.
Main Results:
- SSUR proposes a higher GFR threshold (< 45 ml/min) for CI-AKI risk and metformin discontinuation compared to ESUR (< 30 ml/min/1.73 m²).
- SSUR recommends considering traditional risk factors (diabetes, heart failure) and discontinuing NSAIDs/nephrotoxic drugs, unlike ESUR.
- SSUR advocates for absolute GFR values and specific gram-iodine dose/GFR ratios (< 0.5 for at-risk patients), while ESUR uses relative GFR and lacks specific dose ratio recommendations.
Conclusions:
- SSUR's more cautionary approach is driven by insufficient evidence regarding CI-AKI risks.
- Discrepancies in guideline recommendations necessitate careful consideration by clinicians when managing patients undergoing procedures with contrast media.
- The use of absolute GFR and defined dose/GFR ratios by SSUR aims to enhance patient safety in CI-AKI prevention.
Abstract:
A side-by-side comparison of updated guidelines regarding contrast medium-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) from the Swedish Society of Uroradiology (SSUR) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) is presented. The major discrepancies include a higher glomerular filtration rate (GFR) threshold as a risk factor for CI-AKI and for discontinuation of metformin by SSUR, i.e., < 45 ml/min versus < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 by ESUR, when intravenous or intra-arterial contrast media (CM) with second-pass renal exposure is administered. SSUR also continues to recommend consideration of traditional non-renal risk factors such as diabetes and congestive heart failure, while ESUR considers these factors as non-specific for CI-AKI and does not recommend any consideration. Contrary to ESUR, SSUR also recommends discontinuation of NSAID and nephrotoxic medication if possible. Insufficient evidence at the present time motivates the more cautionary attitude taken by SSUR. Furthermore, SSUR expresses GFR thresholds in absolute values in ml/min as recommended by the National Kidney Foundation for drugs excreted by glomerular filtration, while ESUR uses the relative GFR normalised to body surface area in ml/min/1.73 m2. CM dose/GFR ratio thresholds established for coronary angiography/interventions are also applied as recommendations for CM-enhanced CT by SSUR, since SSUR regards coronary procedures as a second-pass renal exposure of CM with no obvious difference in the incidence of AKI compared with IV CM administration. Finally, SSUR recommends reducing the gram-iodine dose/GFR ratio from < 1.0 in patients not at risk to < 0.5 in patients at risk of CI-AKI, while ESUR has no such recommendation. KEY POINTS: • The more cautionary attitude taken by SSUR compared with that of ESUR is motivated by insufficient evidence regarding risk for contrast medium-induced acute kidney injuries (CI-AKI). • SSUR recommends that absolute and not relative GFR should be used when dosing drugs eliminated by the kidneys such as contrast media. • According to SSUR the gram-iodine dose/GFR ratio should be < 0.5 in patients at risk of CI-AKI, while ESUR has no such recommendation.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction
Acute Kidney Injury II: Pathophysiology
Acute Kidney Injury VI: Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations

