Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Synthesis of Programmable Main-chain Liquid-crystalline Elastomers Using a Two-stage Thiol-acrylate Reaction
Published on: January 19, 2016
Evaluating Nucleophile Byproduct Formation during Phosphine- and Amine-Promoted Thiol-Methyl Acrylate Reactions
Stephen H Frayne1, Brian H Northrop1
1Department of Chemistry , Wesleyan University , Middletown , Connecticut 06459 , United States.
Abstract:
The commonly accepted mechanism of nucleophile-initiated thiol-acrylate reactions requires the formation of undesired nucleophile byproducts. A systematic evaluation of the formation of such nucleophile byproducts has been carried out to understand the relationships between byproduct formation and nucleophile structure, stoichiometry, solvent, and reaction type. Three common nucleophiles for thiol-Michael reactions were investigated: dimethylphenylphosphine (DMPP), diethylamine (DEA), and hexylamine (HA). The formation of phosphonium ester and aza-Michael byproducts upon initiating a representative thiol-acrylate reaction between 1-hexanethiol and methyl acrylate at a range of initiator loading (0.01-10.0 equiv) and in different solvents (neat, DMSO, THF, and CHCl3) was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. The influence of reaction type was investigated by expanding from small molecule reactions to end group thiol-acrylate functionalization of PEG-diacrylate polymers and through investigations of polymer-polymer coupling reactions. Results indicate that the propensity of forming nucleophile byproducts varies with nucleophile type, solvent, and reaction type. Interestingly, for all but polymer-polymer ligation reactions, nucleophile byproduct formation is largely unobserved for nitrogen-centered nucleophiles DEA and HA and essentially nonexistent for the phorphorous-centered nucleophile DMPP. A rationale for the differences in nucleophile byproduct formation for DMPP, DEA, and HA is proposed and supported by experimental and computational analysis.
More Related Videos
13:59Methods to Identify the NMR Resonances of the 13C-Dimethyl N-terminal Amine on Reductively Methylated Proteins
Published on: December 12, 2013
12:08Catalytic Reactions at Amine-Stabilized and Ligand-Free Platinum Nanoparticles Supported on Titania During Hydrogenation of Alkenes and Aldehydes
Published on: June 24, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Preparation and Reactions of Thiols
Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions
In 1896, the German chemist Paul Walden discovered that he could interconvert pure enantiomeric (+) and (-) malic acids through a series of reactions. This conversion suggested the involvement of optical inversion during the substitution reaction. Further, in 1930, Sir Christopher Ingold described for the first time two different forms of nucleophilic substitution reactions, which are known as SN1 (nucleophilic substitution unimolecular) and SN2 (nucleophilic substitution...
Phase II Reactions: Methylation Reactions
The mechanism of methylation unfolds in two stages. The first stage sees a methyltransferase enzyme facilitating the transfer of a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to the substrate, forming S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH). The second stage involves further metabolism of SAH into homocysteine, which can be recycled...
Reactions of α-Halocarbonyl Compounds: Nucleophilic Substitution
Aldehydes and Ketones with Amines: Imine Formation Mechanism
Imines are formed under mildly acidic conditions. A pH of 4.5 is ideal for the reaction.
If the pH is low or the solution is too acidic, the reaction slows down in the...
Aldehydes and Ketones with Amines: Enamine Formation Mechanism