Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

8.4K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

11.5K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.5K
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity01:23

Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity

577
Adolescence is a pivotal period of identity formation, during which individuals begin to answer questions central to their sense of self, such as "Who am I?" and "Who do I hope to become?" Both parents and peers play critical roles in guiding adolescents through this complex developmental phase.
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth....
577
Design Consideration01:22

Design Consideration

580
Designing a structure involves a series of considerations, primarily the material's ultimate strength, calculated through tests that measure changes under increased force until the material reaches its breaking point or limit. The ultimate load, where the material breaks, is divided by its original cross-sectional area, resulting in the ultimate normal stress or strength. The ultimate shearing stress is another significant factor taken into account.
The factor of safety is another key...
580
Tensile Strength Considerations of Concrete01:16

Tensile Strength Considerations of Concrete

554
Considering the tensile strength of concrete involves recognizing that the theoretical strength of cement paste can be up to a thousand times higher than what is observed in practical applications. This significant discrepancy is largely attributed to the presence of microscopic cracks within the concrete. These cracks tend to amplify stress at their tips when a load is applied, a phenomenon explained by Griffith's theory of brittle fracture.
The dimensions and shape of a concrete specimen...
554
Transmission Line Design Considerations01:23

Transmission Line Design Considerations

631
Aluminum has become the material of choice for overhead transmission lines, surpassing copper due to its abundance and cost-effectiveness. The most prevalent type is the aluminum conductor, steel-reinforced (ACSR), which combines aluminum strands around a steel core. Other variants include all-aluminum conductors (AAC), all-aluminum alloy conductors (AAAC), aluminum conductor alloy-reinforced (ACAR), and aluminum-clad steel conductors. Advanced designs, such as aluminum conductors with steel...
631

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Open science interventions to improve reproducibility and replicability of research: a scoping review.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same author

Open Science at the generative AI turn: An exploratory analysis of challenges and opportunities.

Quantitative science studies·2025
Same author

The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same author

The societal impact of Open Science: a scoping review.

Royal Society open science·2024
Same author

Scoping review and evidence mapping of interventions aimed at improving reproducible and replicable science: Protocol.

Open research Europe·2024
Same author

Open peer review urgently requires evidence: A call to action.

PLoS biology·2023
Same journal

Sentiment Analysis of Acceptance TVET Online Courses on the Skill Academy App from Google Play: Leveraging Text Mining with Comparison Machine Learning Model.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

Emotional intelligence: An important skill to learn now more than ever.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

East Mediterranean Lineage of <i>Brucella melitensis</i> in Human Isolates and Milk Samples in Oman Using MLVA-14.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

Application of K-Means Clustering for Job Applicant Analysis in Construction Firms Using R.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

The influence of self-esteem and emotional intelligence on addiction to social networks in Peruvian university students.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

A Bibliometric Analysis of Music's Role in Promoting Well-Being in Health Science Research.

F1000Research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Peering at Brain Polysomes with Atomic Force Microscopy
08:49

Peering at Brain Polysomes with Atomic Force Microscopy

Published on: March 16, 2016

8.8K

Ten considerations for open peer review.

Birgit Schmidt1, Tony Ross-Hellauer2, Xenia van Edig3

  • 1State and University Library, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, 37070, Germany.

F1000Research
|August 24, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Open peer review (OPR) increases transparency in research. This guide offers ten practical considerations for authors, reviewers, and editors to maximize benefits and navigate challenges in OPR.

Keywords:
good practiceopen peer reviewopen scienceresearch integrity

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery
04:14

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery

Published on: September 22, 2023

925
Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
15:01

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

Published on: January 18, 2013

15.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Peering at Brain Polysomes with Atomic Force Microscopy
08:49

Peering at Brain Polysomes with Atomic Force Microscopy

Published on: March 16, 2016

8.8K
Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery
04:14

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery

Published on: September 22, 2023

925
Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
15:01

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

Published on: January 18, 2013

15.9K

Area of Science:

  • Scholarly communication
  • Research integrity
  • Open science practices

Background:

  • Open peer review (OPR) is gaining traction as a component of open science.
  • It seeks to enhance transparency and engagement in academic review.
  • Understanding OPR's nuances is crucial for its effective implementation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define open peer review and its variations.
  • To explore the advantages and disadvantages of OPR compared to traditional review.
  • To provide practical guidance for stakeholders involved in OPR.

Main Methods:

  • Synthesized insights from discussions with authors, reviewers, editors, publishers, and librarians.
  • Developed ten key considerations for implementing OPR.
  • Compiled a pragmatic, hands-on introduction to OPR principles and best practices.

Main Results:

  • Identified core principles of open peer review.
  • Summarized best practices for conducting OPR.
  • Highlighted potential pitfalls and opportunities associated with OPR.

Conclusions:

  • OPR offers significant value and mutual benefits for researchers and the scientific community.
  • Effective implementation requires careful consideration of its principles and practices.
  • This work provides a foundational guide for navigating the evolving landscape of open peer review.