Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
Published on: July 29, 2013
Phantom Verification of AAA and Acuros Dose Calculations for Lung Cancer: Do Tumor Size and Regression Matter?
Satomi Shiraishi1, Luis E Fong de Los Santos1, John A Antolak1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Purpose:
This study aimed to evaluate dose calculation accuracy for the Eclipse Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB algorithm for various lung tumor sizes and to investigate dosimetric changes associated with treatment of regressing tumors.
Methods And Materials:
A water phantom with cylindrical cork inserts (lung surrogates) was fabricated. Large (202 cm3), medium (54 cm3), and small (3 cm3) solid water tumors were implanted within cork inserts. A plain cork insert was used to simulate a lung without a tumor. The cork inserts and tumors were cut along the long axis, and Gafchromic film was placed between the sections to measure dose distributions. Three-dimensional conformal plans were created using 6 MV and 10 MV beams, and volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were created using 6 MV beams for each tumor size. Doses were calculated using Eclipse AAA and Acuros XB. The measured and calculated dose distributions were compared for each tumor size and treatment algorithm. To simulate a regressing tumor, the original plans created for the large tumor were separately delivered to the phantom that contained a small, medium, or no tumor. The dosimetric effects were evaluated using gamma passing rates with a 2%/2 mm criterion and dose profile comparisons.
Results:
Agreement between the measurements and AAA calculations decreased as tumor size decreased, but Acuros XB showed better agreement for all tumor sizes. The largest difference was observed for a 6 MV volumetric modulated arc therapy plan created to treat the smallest tumor. The gamma passing rate was 89.7% but that of Acuros was 99.5%. For the tumor regression evaluation, the gamma passing rates ranged from 53% to 99% for AAA. For Acuros XB, the gamma passing rates were >98% for all scenarios.
Conclusion:
Both AAA and Acuros XB calculated the dose accurately for the largest lung tumor. For the smallest and regressing tumors, Acuros XB more accurately modelled the dose distribution compared with AAA.
More Related Videos
06:42Plasmonic Photothermal Cancer Therapy: Nanoparticle-embedded Tumor-tissue-mimicking Phantoms for Visualizing Photothermal Temperature Distribution
Published on: May 9, 2025
11:31Using Micro-computed Tomography for the Assessment of Tumor Development and Follow-up of Response to Treatment in a Mouse Model of Lung Cancer
Published on: May 20, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Sample Size Calculation
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods
Regression Toward the Mean
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Classifying Matter by State
Multiple Regression
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...