Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Improving the Use of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Therapy With Validated
Wayne C Levy1, Anne S Hellkamp2, Daniel B Mark3
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
The Seattle Proportional Risk Model (SPRM) effectively identifies variations in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) survival benefit for heart failure patients. This model aids in shared decision-making for primary prevention ICD therapy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Guideline-recommended primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are underutilized, with less than 50% of eligible patients receiving them.
- The Seattle Proportional Risk Model (SPRM) was previously developed to predict sudden death proportion in systolic heart failure patients without ICDs and validated in observational data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if the validated SPRM can improve the identification of significant variations in expected implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) survival benefit.
- To test the SPRM's utility in a primary prevention ICD randomized trial.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT), a placebo-controlled trial involving 2,521 patients with ejection fraction ≤35% and symptomatic heart failure.
- Employed a Cox proportional hazards model to assess the relationship between patient-level SPRM predictions and ICD survival benefit, comparing SPRM to the Seattle Heart Failure Model.
Main Results:
- The SPRM demonstrated a significantly larger effect size (2- to 3.6-fold) in partitioning ICD treatment benefit compared to the Seattle Heart Failure Model.
- ICD benefit varied substantially across SPRM-predicted risk quartiles. For all-cause mortality, benefit ranged from a 10% increase in the highest risk quartile to a 66% decrease in the lowest risk quartile.
- For sudden death mortality, ICD therapy showed a 19% reduction in the highest risk quartile and a 95% reduction in the lowest risk quartile (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions:
- The SPRM serves as a valuable patient-centric tool for shared decision-making in symptomatic systolic heart failure patients who meet Class I criteria for primary prevention ICD therapy.
- The model effectively stratifies patients based on predicted risk, allowing for more personalized assessment of ICD therapy benefits.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Calculi IV: Nutrition Therapy and Prevention
Design of Columns under a Centric Load
Euler's formula is applicable under the assumption that the column is a perfect, straight, homogenous prism, and it is operating...
Reliability and Validity
Relative Risk
What are Estimates?
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
Gene Therapy

