Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Control Systems01:10

Control Systems

1.9K
Control systems are everywhere in contemporary society, influencing diverse applications from aerospace to automated manufacturing. These systems can be found naturally within biological processes, such as blood sugar regulation and heart rate adjustment in response to stress, as well as in man-made systems like elevators and automated vehicles. A control system is essentially a network of subsystems and processes that collaboratively convert specific inputs into desired outputs.
At the heart...
1.9K
Control Systems: Applications01:25

Control Systems: Applications

1.2K
Electrical engineering plays a pivotal role in our daily lives, with control systems at the heart of many applications, from home appliances to sophisticated space shuttles. Control systems manage and regulate the behavior of devices and processes, ensuring they function safely, correctly, and efficiently.
In modern vehicles, control systems manage various functions to enhance performance and safety. The steering wheel and accelerator are primary inputs in a car's control system. The...
1.2K
Feedback control systems01:26

Feedback control systems

725
Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
725
Reinforcement Schedules01:24

Reinforcement Schedules

509
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
509
Open and closed-loop control systems01:17

Open and closed-loop control systems

1.7K
Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
1.7K
Transfer Function in Control Systems01:21

Transfer Function in Control Systems

1.6K
The transfer function is a fundamental concept in the analysis and design of linear time-invariant (LTI) systems. It offers a concise way to understand how a system responds to different inputs in the frequency domain. It serves as a bridge between the time-domain differential equations that describe system dynamics and the frequency-domain representation that facilitates easier manipulation and analysis.
To derive the transfer function, consider a general nth-order linear time-invariant...
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Performance improvement in leader-following consensus of multi-agent systems via MPC-based reset output feedback control.

ISA transactions·2026
Same author

Consensus control and performance recovery of heterogeneous second-order multi-agent systems via two-time-scale separation approach.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Simultaneous model prediction and data-driven control with relaxed assumption on the model.

ISA transactions·2024
Same author

Observer-Based Fault-Tolerant Finite-Time Control of Nonlinear Multiagent Systems.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2023
Same author

Robust nonlinear control of blood glucose in diabetic patients subject to model uncertainties.

ISA transactions·2022
Same author

Optimal robust model predictive reset control design for performance improvement of uncertain linear system.

ISA transactions·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

744

Model predictive-based reset gain-scheduling dynamic control law for polytopic LPV systems.

Navid Vafamand1, Alireza Khayatian1

  • 1School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

ISA Transactions
|August 26, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This article introduces a new way to control complex nonlinear systems that change over time. By combining predictive modeling with a reset mechanism, the authors create a controller that adjusts its behavior to maintain stability. The approach is tested on a chemical reactor to show its effectiveness in real-world scenarios.

Keywords:
Continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR)D-stabilityDynamic controllerGain-schedulingLinear matrix inequality (LMI)Polytopic linear parameter varying (LPV) systemReset controlgain-schedulingpredictive controlconvex optimizationprocess automation

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

69.8K
Predicting Gene Silencing Through the Spatiotemporal Control of siRNA Release from Photo-responsive Polymeric Nanocarriers
11:53

Predicting Gene Silencing Through the Spatiotemporal Control of siRNA Release from Photo-responsive Polymeric Nanocarriers

Published on: July 21, 2017

7.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

744
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

69.8K
Predicting Gene Silencing Through the Spatiotemporal Control of siRNA Release from Photo-responsive Polymeric Nanocarriers
11:53

Predicting Gene Silencing Through the Spatiotemporal Control of siRNA Release from Photo-responsive Polymeric Nanocarriers

Published on: July 21, 2017

7.7K

Area of Science:

  • Control systems engineering within polytopic LPV systems research
  • Applied mathematics in nonlinear dynamics

Background:

No prior work had resolved the challenge of integrating predictive control with reset mechanisms for systems defined by polytopic linear parameter varying models. Existing control strategies often struggle to maintain performance when system parameters shift rapidly during operation. That uncertainty drove the need for a more robust framework capable of handling nonlinear dynamics effectively. Prior research has shown that gain-scheduling techniques provide a foundation for managing parameter variations in diverse industrial applications. However, standard controllers frequently encounter limitations when faced with the complex constraints inherent in these specific mathematical representations. This gap motivated the development of a systematic design procedure that addresses both stability and performance requirements. Researchers have long sought methods to improve transient response while ensuring the system remains within safe operating boundaries. The current study builds upon these foundational concepts to offer a refined solution for modern control challenges.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study is to develop a systematic design procedure for a reset gain-scheduling dynamic controller. This research addresses the complexity of controlling nonlinear systems that are represented by polytopic linear parameter varying models. The authors seek to bridge the gap between predictive control methods and reset logic to improve system stability. By defining a novel D-stability region, the work provides a mathematical foundation for deriving controller conditions. The investigation focuses on both offline computation and online execution to ensure real-time feasibility. A primary motivation is to overcome the limitations of traditional gain-scheduling techniques in handling nonlinearities. The researchers also intend to resolve the Zeno solution problem through the implementation of temporal regulation. This study establishes a comprehensive framework for designing controllers that adapt to changing system parameters.

Main Methods:

The review approach involves a two-stage design process consisting of offline and online phases. Investigators formulate sufficient conditions using linear matrix inequalities to determine feedback gain vertices. Convex optimization algorithms calculate these vertices to ensure stability within the defined D-stability region. During the online phase, the team selects an affine after reset value function for controller states. They solve a generalized Eigenvalue problem to achieve this optimal selection based on a predefined reset set. Furthermore, the authors incorporate a temporal regulation strategy to manage reset timing. This configuration avoids the Zeno phenomenon by enforcing a minimum time interval between consecutive resets. The study applies this methodology to a continuous stirred tank reactor to verify its practical utility.

Main Results:

The proposed controller effectively regulates the nonlinear continuous stirred tank reactor, demonstrating superior performance over standard linear approaches. Key findings from the literature indicate that the offline derivation of feedback gains ensures stability across the entire parameter space. The convex optimization technique successfully computes the vertices required for the gain-scheduling dynamic controller. By solving the generalized Eigenvalue problem, the researchers achieve an optimal selection of the affine after reset value function. The temporal regulation technique proves successful in preventing the Zeno solution problem during operation. The systematic approach provides a robust framework for managing systems represented by polytopic linear parameter varying models. These results confirm that the integration of predictive methods with reset logic maintains system performance under varying conditions. The empirical application validates the theoretical claims regarding the stability and efficiency of the new control law.

Conclusions:

The authors demonstrate that their proposed controller successfully manages nonlinear dynamics in a continuous stirred tank reactor. This synthesis confirms that the integration of predictive methods with reset logic enhances overall system performance. The findings indicate that the offline computation of feedback gains provides a reliable basis for online operation. The researchers suggest that their approach effectively addresses stability concerns through the use of linear matrix inequalities. By employing a temporal regulation technique, the study successfully prevents the occurrence of Zeno solutions. The evidence supports the claim that the affine after reset value function allows for optimal state selection. These results imply that the systematic design procedure is applicable to a broad class of nonlinear systems. The study concludes that this hybrid control law offers significant advantages over traditional gain-scheduling methods.

The researchers propose a hybrid strategy that combines model predictive control with a reset mechanism. This approach utilizes offline linear matrix inequalities to compute feedback gains, while an online generalized Eigenvalue problem optimizes the controller states to ensure stability and performance.

The authors utilize a temporal regulation technique to manage the reset frequency. This specific tool prevents the Zeno solution problem, which otherwise causes an infinite number of resets within a finite time interval, ensuring the controller remains computationally feasible and physically realistic.

The design requires a D-stability region to derive sufficient conditions for the controller. This geometric constraint is necessary to guarantee that the closed-loop poles remain within a desired area, ensuring transient performance and stability for the polytopic model.

The polytopic linear parameter varying model serves as the mathematical representation of the nonlinear system. This data structure allows the researchers to approximate complex nonlinear behaviors as a convex combination of linear systems, facilitating the use of convex optimization techniques.

The researchers measure the effectiveness of their controller by applying it to a nonlinear continuous stirred tank reactor. This benchmark demonstrates the ability of the proposed law to handle real-world chemical process dynamics compared to standard linear controllers.

The authors claim that their systematic design procedure provides a robust framework for nonlinear systems. They suggest that this approach offers superior flexibility compared to conventional gain-scheduling, particularly in managing state transitions and maintaining stability under varying operating conditions.