Cardiac diastolic dysfunction predicts poor prognosis in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis
Soon Kyu Lee1, Myeong Jun Song1, Seok Hwan Kim1
1Division of Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea.
Insights
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) significantly reduces survival in liver cirrhosis (LC) patients. Monitoring LVDD is crucial for improving outcomes in decompensated liver disease.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hepatology
- Echocardiography
Background:
- Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is an early cardiac issue in liver cirrhosis (LC).
- The impact of LVDD on survival, particularly in decompensated LC, remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between LVDD and overall survival in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis.
Main Methods:
- Prospective enrollment of 70 decompensated LC patients.
- Cardiac function assessed via 2D echocardiography with tissue Doppler imaging.
- LVDD diagnosis based on American Society of Echocardiography guidelines; primary endpoint was overall survival.
Main Results:
- 62.9% of patients had LVDD.
- LVDD was associated with significantly lower survival rates (31.1 months vs. 42.6 months, P=0.01).
- LVDD and Child-Pugh score were independent predictors of survival; higher E/e' ratio indicated poorer survival.
Conclusions:
- LVDD presence is linked to poor survival in decompensated LC patients.
- Monitoring LVDD in these patients is important for clinical management.
Background/Aims:
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is an early manifestation of cardiac dysfunction in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). However, the effect of LVDD on survival has not been clarified, especially in decompensated LC.
Methods:
We prospectively enrolled 70 patients with decompensated LC, including ascites or variceal bleeding, at Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital from April 2013 to April 2015. The cardiac function of these patients was evaluated using 2D echocardiography with tissue Doppler imaging. The diagnosis of LVDD was based on the American Society of Echocardiography guidelines. The primary endpoint was overall survival.
Results:
Forty-four patients (62.9%) had LVDD. During follow-up (22.3 months), 18 patients died (16 with LVDD and 2 without LVDD). The survival rate was significantly lower in patients with LVDD than in those without LVDD (31.1 months vs. 42.6 months, P=0.01). In a multivariate analysis, the Child-Pugh score and LVDD were independent predictors of survival. Moreover, patients with a ratio of early filling velocity to early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E/e') ≥ 10 (LVDD grade 2) had lower survival than patients with E/e' ratio < 10.
Conclusion:
The presence of LVDD is associated with poor survival in patients with decompensated LC. Therefore, it may be important to monitor and closely follow LVDD patients.
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Liver Histology
Hepatocytes perform a variety of essential functions. They secrete...


