Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

High-precision Electromagnetic Flowmeter with Empty Pipe Detection via Complex Programmable Logic Device-based Waveform Recognition
Published on: June 27, 2025
Electromagnetic interference from personal dust monitors and other electronic devices with proximity detection
J Noll1, R J Matetic1, J Li1
1J. Noll, R.J. Matetic, member SME, J. Li, C. Zhou, J. DuCarme, M. Reyes and J. Srednicki are senior research chemist, director of Pittsburgh Mining Research Division, senior mining engineer, lead electrical engineer, lead mechanical engineer, lead electrical engineer and electronic technician, respectively, at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, jnoll@cdc.gov.
The PDM3700 dust monitor can interfere with proximity detection systems, posing hazards to underground coal miners. Keeping the monitor at least 15 cm from other devices prevents this interference.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health and Safety
- Mining Engineering
- Electrical Engineering
Background:
- The Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) mandated continuous personal dust monitors for underground coal miners in 2016.
- The PDM3700 personal dust monitor is used for compliance but interferes with proximity detection systems.
- This interference creates striking and pinning hazards for miners operating continuous mining machines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the electromagnetic interference between the PDM3700, other electronic devices, and proximity detection systems.
- To determine safe operating distances to mitigate interference and ensure miner safety.
- To provide guidance for the simultaneous use of personal dust monitors and proximity detection systems.
Main Methods:
- Reviewed existing standards related to electronic device interference in mining environments.
- Developed standardized test protocols for evaluating device interactions.
- Conducted laboratory experiments to assess electromagnetic interference under controlled conditions.
- Evaluated the impact of separation distances between the PDM3700, other devices, and proximity detection system components.
Main Results:
- Electromagnetic interference was identified as the cause of disruptions between electronic devices, including the PDM3700, and proximity detection systems.
- No significant interference occurred when the PDM3700 and proximity detection system components were separated by 15 cm (6 inches) or more.
- The study confirmed that the PDM3700 and personal alarm devices require a minimum separation of 15 cm for simultaneous, interference-free operation.
Conclusions:
- A separation distance of at least 15 cm is crucial for the safe and effective use of the PDM3700 personal dust monitor alongside proximity detection systems.
- Implementing this separation distance mitigates electromagnetic interference risks, reducing potential hazards for underground coal miners.
- Further research and adherence to recommended separation guidelines are essential for maintaining a safe mining environment.
Related Concept Videos
The Electromagnetic Spectrum
The Electromagnetic Spectrum
Interference and Diffraction
RNA Interference
This process occurs naturally in cells, often through the activity of genomically-encoded microRNAs. Researchers can take advantage of this mechanism by introducing synthetic RNAs to deactivate specific genes for research or therapeutic purposes. For example, RNAi could be used...
Electromagnetic Waves
Electromagnetic Fields
However, the observation of...

