Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
Published on: May 3, 2018
Living sustainability, or merely pretending? From explicit self-report measures to implicit cognition
Gerald Steiner1, Bernhard Geissler1,2, Günther Schreder1
11Department for Knowledge and Communication Management, Faculty of Business and Globalization, Danube University Krems, Dr.-Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems, Austria.
Organizational sustainability culture may be weak due to a mismatch between explicit and implicit attitudes. This study used the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to reveal low congruence between executives' stated and subconscious sustainability beliefs.
Area of Science:
- Organizational Psychology
- Sustainability Science
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Explicit attitudes may not align with implicit attitudes, particularly in sustainability research.
- Current sustainability research often overlooks implicit measures and focuses on isolated aspects.
- The congruence between implicit and explicit attitudes is proposed as foundational to an organization's sustainability culture.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the congruence between explicit and implicit sustainability attitudes among executives.
- To highlight the limitations of traditional surveys in measuring implicit attitudes and attitude congruence.
- To establish a baseline for understanding the role of attitude congruence in organizational sustainability.
Main Methods:
- A browser-based Implicit Association Test (IAT) was employed as a reaction-time cognitive measure for implicit attitudes.
- A questionnaire-based survey was administered to assess explicit sustainability attitudes.
- Data from 114 executives were analyzed using Pearson correlation, repeated measures MANOVA, and principal component analysis.
Main Results:
- A low degree of congruence was found between executives' explicit and implicit sustainability orientations (Pearson's r ranging from -0.10 to 0.31).
- Findings suggest potential influences of impression management and limited self-awareness regarding sustainability orientation.
- The study identified a significant gap between espoused sustainability values and underlying cognitive processes.
Conclusions:
- The incongruence between explicit and implicit sustainability attitudes poses a challenge for genuine organizational sustainability.
- Rethinking internal and external learning processes is crucial for fostering alignment between attitudes and actions.
- Addressing this knowledge gap is essential for advancing sustainability initiatives within organizations and society.
Related Concept Videos
Sustainable Development
Explicit Memories
Episodic memory contains information about personally experienced events and is reported as a story. An example of episodic memory is recalling a birthday celebration. This type of memory includes the what, where, and when of an event, as...
Implicit Differentiation
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
Implicit Differentiation: Problem Solving
Second Derivatives of Implicit Functions

