Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Establishing Dual Resistance to EGFR-TKI and MET-TKI in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells In Vitro with a 2-step Dose-escalation Procedure
Published on: August 11, 2017
c-MET Overexpression as a Poor Predictor of MET Amplifications or Exon 14 Mutations in Lung Sarcomatoid Carcinomas
Xavier Mignard1, Anne-Marie Ruppert2, Martine Antoine3
1Sorbonne University, GRC n°04, Theranoscan, F-75252, Paris, France.
Introduction:
MNNG HOS transforming gene (MET) abnormalities such as amplification and exon 14 mutations may be responsive to targeted therapies. They are prevalent in lung sarcomatoid carcinomas (LSCs) and must be diagnosed as efficiently as possible. Hypothetically, c-MET overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) may prove effective as a screening test for MET abnormalities.
Methods:
Tissue samples were obtained from consecutive patients with a resected LSC in four oncologic centers. IHC was performed using the SP44 antibody (Ventana, Tucson, Arizona) and evaluated using the MetMab score and H-score. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was applied with the dual color probe set from Zytovision (Clinisciences, Nanterre, France). True MET amplification was diagnosed when MET gene copy number was 5 or greater and the ratio between MET gene copy number and chromosome 7 number was greater than 2. All MET exon 14 alterations including those affecting splice sites occurring within splice donor and acceptor sites were detected in the routine molecular testing on genetic platforms.
Results:
A total of 81 LSCs were included. Fourteen (17%) exhibited positive IHC using the MetMab score and 15 (18.5%) using the H-score. MET amplification was detected in six tumors (8.5%) and MET exon 14 mutation in five (6%). A weak positive correlation between IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization was found (r = 0.27, p = 0.0001). IHC sensitivity for MET amplification was 50%, with a specificity of 83%, positive predictive value of 21.4%, and negative predictive value of 94.7%. IHC sensitivity for MET exon 14 mutations was 20%, with a specificity of 83%, positive predictive value of 7%, and negative predictive value of 94%.
Conclusion:
IHC is not a relevant screening tool for MET abnormalities in LSC.
Insights
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is not a reliable screening tool for detecting MNNG HOS transforming gene (MET) abnormalities in lung sarcomatoid carcinomas (LSCs). This study found IHC had low sensitivity and predictive values for identifying MET amplification and exon 14 mutations.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Pathology
- Genetics
Background:
- MNNG HOS transforming gene (MET) abnormalities, including amplification and exon 14 mutations, are potential targets for therapy in lung sarcomatoid carcinomas (LSCs).
- Efficient diagnosis of MET abnormalities is crucial for timely treatment initiation in LSC patients.
- Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for c-MET overexpression was hypothesized as a potential screening method for MET alterations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a screening tool for detecting MET abnormalities (amplification and exon 14 mutations) in lung sarcomatoid carcinomas (LSCs).
Main Methods:
- Tissue samples from 81 resected LSCs were analyzed using IHC (MetMab score and H-score) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for MET amplification.
- Routine molecular testing was employed to detect MET exon 14 alterations.
- Correlation between IHC results and genetic testing (FISH and molecular analysis) was assessed.
Main Results:
- IHC detected c-MET overexpression in 17-18.5% of LSCs, while MET amplification was found in 8.5% and MET exon 14 mutations in 6%.
- A weak positive correlation (r=0.27) was observed between IHC and FISH results.
- IHC demonstrated low sensitivity (50% for amplification, 20% for exon 14 mutations) and low positive predictive values (21.4% for amplification, 7% for exon 14 mutations).
Conclusions:
- Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is not a relevant or effective screening tool for identifying MET abnormalities in lung sarcomatoid carcinomas (LSCs).
- The low sensitivity and predictive values indicate that IHC alone is insufficient for guiding targeted therapy decisions in LSCs based on MET status.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Exon Recombination
Exon shuffling follows “splice frame rules.” Each exon...
Mutations
Mutations
Chromosomal Alterations Are Large-Scale Mutations
While point mutations are changes in a single nucleotide in...
Viral Mutations
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
Lung Capacity

