Improving Outcomes in Oncological Colorectal Surgery by Prehabilitation
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Rodent Stereotaxic Surgery and Animal Welfare Outcome Improvements for Behavioral Neuroscience
Published on: January 30, 2012
Emma R J Bruns1, Stefanus J van Rooijen, Tanja E Argillander
1From the Department of Surgery, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands (ERJB, TEA, ESvdZ, PvD); Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (ERJB, CJB, WAB); Department of Surgery, Maxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, the Netherlands (SJvR, GDS); Department of Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands (WMUvG); Department of Geriatrics, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands (BCvM); Department of Internal/Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center, Groningen, the Netherlands (BCvM); and Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (BvdH).
Introduction:
The cornerstone in the treatment of colorectal cancer is surgery. A surgical event poses a significant risk of decreased functional decline and impaired health-related quality of life. Prehabilitation is defined as the multimodal preoperative enhancement of a patient's condition. It may serve as a strategy to improve postoperative outcomes. Prehabilitation requires a multidisciplinary effort of medical health care professionals and a behavioral change of the patient.
Methods:
The goal of prehabilitation is threefold: (1) to reduce postoperative complications, (2) to enhance and accelerate the recovery of the patient, and (3) to improve overall quality of life. In this article, we introduce the FIT model illustrating a possible framework toward the implementation of both evidence-based and tailor-made prehabilitation for patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer.
Results:
The model is composed of three pillars: "facts" (how to screen patients and evidence on what content to prescribe), "integration" (data of own questionnaires assessing motivation of patients and specialists), and finally "tools" (which outcome measurements to use).
Discussion:
Developing implementable methods and defining standardized outcome instruments will help establish a solid base for patient-centered prehabilitation programs. Any party introducing prehabilitation requiring multidisciplinary teamwork and behavioral change can potentially use this framework.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
10:54Isolation of Human Endothelial Cells from Normal Colon and Colorectal Carcinoma - An Improved Protocol
Published on: April 4, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Improving Translational Accuracy
Self-Discrepancy Theory