Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
Machine Learning Methods for Identifying Critical Data Elements in Nursing Documentation
Eliezer Bose1, Sasank Maganti, Kathryn H Bowles
1Eliezer Bose, PhD, BEng, APRN, ACNP-BC, is Assistant Professor, University of Texas at Austin School of Nursing. Sagank Maganti, MS, B-Tech, is Research Assistant, University of Minnesota Carlson School of Computer Science and Engineering, Minneapolis. Kathryn H. Bowles, PhD, RN, FAAN, FACMI, is Professor, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia. Bonnie L. Brueshoff, DNP, RN, PHN, is Public Health Director at Dakota County, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Karen A. Monsen, PhD, RN, FAAN, is Associate Professor, University of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis.
Background:
Public health nurses (PHNs) engage in home visiting services and documentation of care services for at-risk clients. To increase efficiency and decrease documentation burden, it would be useful for PHNs to identify critical data elements most associated with patient care priorities and outcomes. Machine learning techniques can aid in retrospective identification of critical data elements.
Objective:
We used two different machine learning feature selection techniques of minimum redundancy-maximum relevance (mRMR) and LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) and elastic net regularized generalized linear model (glmnet in R).
Methods:
We demonstrated application of these techniques on the Omaha System database of 205 data elements (features) with a cohort of 756 family home visiting clients who received at least one visit from PHNs in a local Midwest public health agency. A dichotomous maternal risk index served as the outcome for feature selection.
Application:
Using mRMR as a feature selection technique, out of 206 features, 50 features were selected with scores greater than zero, and generalized linear model applied on the 50 features achieved highest accuracy of 86.2% on a held-out test set. Using glmnet as a feature selection technique and obtaining feature importance, 63 features had importance scores greater than zero, and generalized linear model applied on them achieved the highest accuracy of 95.5% on a held-out test set.
Discussion:
Feature selection techniques show promise toward reducing public health nursing documentation burden by identifying the most critical data elements needed to predict risk status. Further studies to refine the process of feature selection can aid in informing PHNs' focus on client-specific and targeted interventions in the delivery of care.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Formats for Nursing Documentation
Nursing Assessment Form:
• A nursing assessment form is a foundational document that captures detailed patient data from physical assessments and nursing histories.
• It includes patient demographics, medical history,...
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Data Reporting and Recording
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...

