Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reversible and Irreversible Processes

Reversible and Irreversible Processes

The thermodynamic processes can be classified into reversible and irreversible processes. The processes that can be restored to their initial state are called reversible processes. It is only possible if the process is in quasi-static equilibrium, i.e., it takes place in infinitesimally small steps, and the system remains at equilibrium However, these are ideal processes and do not occur naturally. An ideal system undergoing a reversible process is always in thermodynamic equilibrium within...

Entropy Change in Reversible Processes

Entropy Change in Reversible Processes

In the Carnot engine, which achieves the maximum efficiency between two reservoirs of fixed temperatures, the total change in entropy is zero. The observation can be generalized by considering any reversible cyclic process consisting of many Carnot cycles. Thus, it can be stated that the total entropy change of any ideal reversible cycle is zero.
The statement can be further generalized to prove that entropy is a state function. Take a cyclic process between any two points on a p-V diagram.

What is a Sensory System?

What is a Sensory System?

Sensory systems detect stimuli—such as light and sound waves—and transduce them into neural signals that can be interpreted by the nervous system. In addition to external stimuli detected by the senses, some sensory systems detect internal stimuli—such as the proprioceptors in muscles and tendons that send feedback about limb position.

Correlation and Causation

Correlation and Causation

Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...

Correlations

Correlations

Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...

Correlation

Correlation

In statistics, two variables are said to be correlated if the values of one variable are associated with the other variable. Depending on the relationship between two variables, correlation can be of three types– positive correlation, negative correlation, and zero correlation.
Two variables, for example, a and b, are said to be positively correlated if both variables move in the same direction. In other words, a positive correlation exists between two variables, a and b, if:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Support academic institutions under attack.

Nature·2026

Same author

Screening and characterization of EGFR-targeted specific nanobodies.

Protein expression and purification·2026

Same author

Control of cortical population activity with patterned microstimulation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Hierarchical binding of cognition to action in the human basal ganglia-thalamic circuit.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

The geometry of context-dependent biased decisions during learning.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Anterior inferotemporal cortex represents decision formation and termination without ramps.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same journal

Kat5 deficiency in alveolar type II cells licenses STAT6-driven glycolytic reprogramming and pulmonary fibrosis.

Nature communications·2026

Same journal

Continuous nonthermal slab gap formed by progressive tearing beneath Northeast Asia.

Nature communications·2026

Same journal

Zeolitic isolated protonic acid sites-mediated NH<sub>3</sub> storage for robust NO<sub>x</sub> removal.

Nature communications·2026

Same journal

Coaxially nested component with asymmetric fiber resonant cavity and separation membrane for gaseous and dissolved gases detection.

Nature communications·2026

Same journal

Near-unity charge readout signal in a nonlinear resonator without matching the sensor dissipation.

Nature communications·2026

Same journal

Prokaryotic Schlafen proteins cleave tRNAs during type III CRISPR immunity.

Nature communications·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

Published on: May 2, 2019

Psychophysical reverse correlation reflects both sensory and decision-making processes.

Gouki Okazawa¹, Long Sha¹, Braden A Purcell¹

¹Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA.

Nature Communications

|August 30, 2018

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Psychophysical reverse correlation, used to study sensory processes, also reflects decision-making. Ignoring decision details misinterprets results, but including them enhances this method for studying both sensory and decision mechanisms.

More Related Videos

Correlative Confocal and 3D Electron Microscopy of a Specific Sensory Cell

Correlative Confocal and 3D Electron Microscopy of a Specific Sensory Cell

Published on: July 19, 2015

Dynamic Quantitative Sensory Testing to Characterize Central Pain Processing

Dynamic Quantitative Sensory Testing to Characterize Central Pain Processing

Published on: February 16, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

Published on: May 2, 2019

Correlative Confocal and 3D Electron Microscopy of a Specific Sensory Cell

Correlative Confocal and 3D Electron Microscopy of a Specific Sensory Cell

Published on: July 19, 2015

Dynamic Quantitative Sensory Testing to Characterize Central Pain Processing

Dynamic Quantitative Sensory Testing to Characterize Central Pain Processing

Published on: February 16, 2017

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Computational Neuroscience
Psychophysics

Background:

Goal-directed behavior relies on sensory input and decision-making processes.
Psychophysical reverse correlation is a standard method to assess sensory processing by analyzing how stimulus fluctuations affect behavior.
This technique is traditionally interpreted as revealing the spatiotemporal weighting functions of sensory systems.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether psychophysical reverse correlation methods are influenced by decision-making processes.
To determine if decision-making factors can distort the interpretation of sensory weighting functions.
To demonstrate how to properly utilize decision-making details within reverse correlation analysis.

Main Methods:

Utilized psychophysical reverse correlation techniques.
Systematically altered decision-making parameters, including decision bounds and evidence integration mechanisms.
Analyzed the impact of trial-to-trial variability in sensory delays, motor delays, and decision times on reverse correlation kernels.

Main Results:

Demonstrated that reverse correlation kernels are systematically altered by changes in decision bounds and evidence integration.
Showed that variability in sensory and motor delays, as well as decision times, introduces distortions not attributable to sensory filters.
Confirmed that reverse correlations can deviate significantly from true sensory weighting functions due to decision-making influences.

Conclusions:

Psychophysical reverse correlation is not solely a measure of sensory processing but also reflects decision-making mechanisms.
Failure to account for decision-making processes leads to misinterpretation of reverse correlation results.
Incorporating decision-making details transforms reverse correlation into a powerful tool for investigating both sensory and decision-making functions.