Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Building An Open-source Robotic Stereotaxic Instrument
Published on: October 29, 2013
Surgical Instrument Reprocessing in Resource-Constrained Countries: A Scoping Review of Existing Methods, Policies,
Jared A Forrester1,2, Brittany Lynn Powell3, Joseph D Forrester1
11 Department of Surgery, Stanford University , Stanford, California.
Background:
Surgical infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Inadequately reprocessed surgical instruments can be a vector for pathogens. Little has been published on the current state of surgical instrument reprocessing in LMICs.
Methods:
We performed a scoping review of English-language articles in PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases describing current methods, policies, and barriers to surgical instrument reprocessing in LMICs. We conducted qualitative analysis of all studies to categorize existing practices and barriers to successful surgical instrument reprocessing. Barriers were non-exclusively categorized by theme: training/education, resource availability, environment, and policies/procedures. Studies associating surgical infections with existing practices were separately evaluated to assess this relationship.
Results:
Nine hundred seventy-two abstracts were identified. Forty studies met criteria for qualitative analysis and three studies associated patient outcomes with surgical instrument reprocessing. Most studies (n = 28, 70%) discussed institution-specific policies/procedures; half discussed shortcomings in staff training. Sterilization (n = 38, 95%), verification of sterilization (n = 19, 48%), and instrument cleaning and decontamination (n = 16, 40%) were the most common instrument reprocessing practices examined. Poor resource availability and the lack of effective education/training and appropriate policies/procedures were cited as the common barriers. Of the case series investigating surgical instrument reprocessing with patient outcomes, improperly cleaned and sterilized neurosurgical instruments and contaminated rinse water were linked to Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventriculitis and Mycobacterium port site infections, respectively.
Conclusions:
Large gaps exist between instrument reprocessing practices in LMICs and recommended policies/procedures. Identified areas for improvement include instrument cleaning and decontamination, sterilization aspects of instrument reprocessing, and verification of sterilization. Education and training of staff responsible for reprocessing instruments and realistic, defined policies and procedures are critical, and lend themselves to improvement interventions.
Insights
Surgical instrument reprocessing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) shows significant gaps. Improving staff training, resources, and policies is crucial to prevent surgical site infections and enhance patient safety in LMICs.
Area of Science:
- Infection Prevention and Control
- Global Health
- Surgical Safety
Background:
- Surgical infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
- Inadequately reprocessed surgical instruments can transmit pathogens.
- There is limited published data on current surgical instrument reprocessing practices in LMICs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a scoping review of surgical instrument reprocessing in LMICs.
- To identify current methods, policies, and barriers.
- To categorize existing practices and barriers to successful reprocessing.
Main Methods:
- Scoping review of English-language articles from PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar.
- Qualitative analysis of 40 studies to categorize practices and barriers.
- Barriers categorized by theme: training/education, resource availability, environment, and policies/procedures.
Main Results:
- Most studies (70%) discussed institution-specific policies/procedures; 50% noted staff training shortcomings.
- Common reprocessing practices examined: sterilization (95%), verification of sterilization (48%), cleaning/decontamination (40%).
- Key barriers: poor resource availability, inadequate education/training, and lack of effective policies/procedures. Improperly processed instruments linked to infections.
Conclusions:
- Significant gaps exist between current instrument reprocessing practices in LMICs and recommended standards.
- Improvements needed in instrument cleaning, decontamination, sterilization, and verification processes.
- Enhanced staff education/training and defined, realistic policies/procedures are critical for intervention.
Related Concept Videos
The Scope of Physics
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Short-distance Transport of Resources
Instrument Calibration
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Instrumentation Amplifier
To overcome this challenge, an ECG machine utilizes an instrumentation amplifier. This specialized amplifier is...

