Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Characterization of the Isolated, Ventilated, and Instrumented Mouse Lung Perfused with Pulsatile Flow
Published on: April 29, 2011
[Analysis of blood flow energy characteristics of pulsatile and non-pulsatile flow during extracorporeal circulation]
1Department of Cardiacsurgery, Changhai Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Insights
Pulsatile perfusion (PP) provides significantly more blood flow energy than non-pulsatile perfusion (NP) during cardiopulmonary bypass. PP better mimics physiological flow
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Hemodynamics
Background:
- Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is essential for cardiac surgery but can alter blood flow dynamics.
- Understanding the energy characteristics of pulsatile versus non-pulsatile flow during CPB is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.
- Physiological blood flow exhibits pulsatile characteristics, which may be important for maintaining organ perfusion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the blood flow energy magnitude and frequency domain characteristics between pulsatile perfusion (PP) and non-pulsatile perfusion (NP) during CPB.
- To analyze how these perfusion methods compare to physiological flow prior to CPB.
- To evaluate energy attenuation in the arterial system under different perfusion modes.
Main Methods:
- Sixty patients undergoing mitral valve surgery were randomized into PP and NP groups.
- Energy Equivalent Pressure (EEP) and Surplus Hemodynamic Energy (SHE) were calculated to quantify blood flow energy.
- Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) was used for power spectral density analysis to assess frequency domain characteristics.
Main Results:
- Pulsatile perfusion (PP) demonstrated significantly higher EEP and SHE compared to non-pulsatile perfusion (NP) distally.
- Physiological pulsatile flow primarily occurs within 40 Hz, with over 90% of energy in the low-frequency range (<40 Hz).
- NP showed a more pronounced decrease in low-frequency energy and greater energy exhaustion during conduction from filter to radial artery compared to PP.
Conclusions:
- Pulsatile perfusion (PP) delivers significantly more energy than non-pulsatile perfusion (NP) during CPB.
- PP more closely replicates the energy frequency structure and attenuation characteristics of physiological pulsatile flow, particularly in the 0-5 Hz range.
- Non-pulsatile perfusion (NP) leads to substantial energy loss, especially in the low-frequency spectrum.
Abstract:
Objective: To analyze the magnitude of blood flow energy and characteristics of frequency domain between pulsatile flow and nonpulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass and physiological flow. Methods: From January 2017 to December 2017, 60 cases of patients with mitral valve disease scheduled for mitral valve replacement or repair at Department of Cardiasurgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University were randomly divided into 2 groups: pulsatile perfusion (PP) and non-pulsatile perfusion (NP). The magnitude of blood flow energy during pulsatile and non-pulsatile was calculated using energy equivalent pressure (EEP) and surplus hemodynamic energy (SHE) while fast Fourier transformation (FFT) was used to perform power spectral density analysis to identify the frequency domain characteristics between artificial and physiological flow (prior to CPB). The data was analyzed by analysis of variance or t test. Results: At the different time-points after occlusion, the EEP and SHE in PP group were respectively 1.52 to 1.62 and 2.03 to 2.22 times higher than NP at the distal of artery filter. The power density analysis revealed that the blood flow energy of physiological pulsatile flow patterns was within 40 Hz and the ratio of low frequency energy was more than 90% before clamp. The spectral energy ratio of low frequency decreased in both group compared with physiological flow was more obvious in NP group at the radial artery. The ratio of estimated value of power density of PP and NP groups analysis showed the corresponding 0 to 5 Hz, 0 to 10 Hz, 0 to 40 Hz frequency range values measured at the radial artery and filter were 9.51, 4.68, 3.59 and 3.87, 2.69, 2.38 respectively after occulusion. In each frequency range, the energy of PP is higher than that of NP, and the lower the frequency, the greater the difference. The ratio of estimated value of power density of PP and NP groups for the three frequencies measured at the radial artery before and after occlusion were 2.86, 2.83, 2.75 and 14.70, 12.74, 9.85 respectively, and decreased significantly in NP group and low frequency energy. The ratio of estimated value of power density of PP and NP groups under the three different frequencies measured at the radial artery and filter were 26.35, 33.15, 37.36 and 37.41, 54.18, 56.64 respectively, in the conduction process from filter to radial artery, energy exhaustion is significant, especially in group NP. Conclusions: The PP provides significantly more energy than the NP whereby the PP is closer to the physiological pulsatile on the energy frequency structure and attenuation characteristics, with mainly low frequency energy of 0 to 5 Hz and weak energy attenuation. The energy loss of non-pulsatile flow is obvious, especially the low frequency energy.
Related Concept Videos
General Characteristics of Pipe Flow I
The classification of fluid...
General External Flow Characteristics
General Characteristics of Pipe Flow II
The distance to reach a fully developed flow is called the entrance length and depends on the...
Blood Flow
Autoregulation of Blood Flow
Chemical Signaling in Autoregulation
Chemical signaling operates at the precapillary sphincter level, inciting either contraction or relaxation....
Energy Considerations in Open Channel Flow

