Reproducibility of Index Lesion Size and Mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Measured by Prostate

Alberto Diaz de Leon1, John R Leyendecker1, Susana Otero-Muinelo1

  • 11 Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2201 Inwood Rd, 2d Fl, Ste 202, Dallas, TX 75390-9085.

Abstract

Insights

This study found excellent agreement for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in prostate cancer MRI, even among inexperienced readers. However, agreement on lesion size between MRI and pathology was only fair.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is crucial for prostate cancer assessment.
  • Accurate measurement of index lesion size and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values is vital for diagnosis and treatment planning.
  • Standardization of measurements across readers is essential for reliable interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the intra- and interreader agreement for index lesion size and mean ADC values in prostate cancer.
  • To assess the impact of reader experience on measurement agreement.
  • To compare MRI-based measurements with whole-mount histopathologic findings.

Main Methods:

  • Five readers with varying experience levels interpreted prostate mpMRI scans from 80 men.
  • Measurements of index lesion size and mean ADC values were performed.
  • Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess agreement.
  • A patient-specific, MRI-based, 3D-printed mold was used as the reference standard.

Main Results:

  • Excellent interreader (ICC=0.84) and intrareader (ICC=0.90) agreement was observed for ADC measurements.
  • Both experienced and inexperienced readers showed excellent agreement for ADC values.
  • Agreement for lesion size between MRI and histopathology ranged from poor (0.32) to good (0.66), with an overall fair agreement (0.49).

Conclusions:

  • Good-to-excellent agreement is achievable for prostate cancer index lesion size and ADC values on mpMRI, irrespective of reader experience.
  • High reproducibility in ADC measurements supports its utility in clinical decision-making.
  • The fair agreement in size measurements highlights a potential area for improvement in standardization and technique.

Related Concept Videos

Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
8.7K
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
4.9K
Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient01:11

Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient

The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable, x, and the dependent variable, y. Hence, it is also known as the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. It can be calculated using the following equation:
8.3K
Correlations02:20

Correlations

Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
36.2K
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
42.8K
Apparent Weight01:09

Apparent Weight

True weight is the measure of the gravitational force acting on an object. However, if the object accelerates, its measured weight is different from its true weight. Similar observations can be made when the object is submerged in water. An object's weight in water is its apparent weight, which is equal to the difference between its true weight and the buoyant forces.
Consider a person standing on a bathroom scale inside an elevator. If the scale is accurate at rest, its reading equals the...
9.8K