Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

14.0K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.0K
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation01:10

In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation

350
In vitro dissolution and drug release tests assess how quickly and how much of a drug is released from its dosage form into an aqueous medium under standardized laboratory conditions. These tests are essential tools in pharmaceutical development and quality assurance, offering insight into the drug's performance before clinical use.During formulation development, dissolution testing identifies incomplete or inconsistent drug release issues. It also supports decisions on selecting the optimal...
350
Development of Analytical Methods01:21

Development of Analytical Methods

2.3K
An analytical methodology can be divided into four sequential steps: technique, method, procedure, and protocol. A technique is a scientific principle that rationalizes a specific phenomenon through chemical measurements. Adapting a technique for analyzing a sample of interest is termed a method. The procedure outlines the directions for performing the analysis via an analytical method. The protocol is the detailed guidelines on the procedure, which should be strictly followed to obtain the...
2.3K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

2.2K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.2K
Distribution Reliability and Automation01:25

Distribution Reliability and Automation

519
Distribution reliability in electrical power systems is critical for ensuring an uninterrupted power supply to consumers at minimal cost. According to IEEE Standard Terms, reliability is the probability that a device will function without failure over a specified time period or amount of usage. For electric power distribution, this translates to maintaining continuous power supply and addressing customer concerns over power outages. Several indices, as defined by IEEE Standard 1366-2012, are...
519
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

2.0K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
2.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Reporting From Whole Blood Creatinine: A Proficiency Testing Survey.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2025
Same author

Large Language Models Lack Sufficient Performance to Provide Definitive Regulatory Guidance.

The journal of applied laboratory medicine·2025
Same author

Laboratory-developed tests and in vitro diagnostics: A regulatory overview for anatomic pathology.

American journal of clinical pathology·2025
Same author

FDA's Final Rule on Laboratory Developed Tests.

Clinical chemistry·2024
Same author

Reported Awareness and Use of Pyridoxal-5'-Phosphate Supplementation in Alanine Aminotransferase and Aspartate Aminotransferase Assay Reagents: A Survey by the College of American Pathologists Clinical Chemistry Committee.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2024
Same author

The US FDA's proposed rule on laboratory-developed tests: Impacts on clinical laboratory testing.

Practical laboratory medicine·2024
Same journal

An evaluation of the necessity of repeat testing of critical and dangerous values in a medical center in Taiwan.

Laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Epitope analysis aids in identification of donor-specific antibody against HLA-DP29 during virtual crossmatch.

Laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Using blood cell histogram analysis for swift anemia diagnosis alongside complete blood cell count and peripheral blood film.

Laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Medical laboratory science course performance and grade point average as indicators of ASCP certification success: a 10-year review from an NAACLS-accredited program.

Laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Renal magnesium wasting and functional hypoparathyroidism: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in hypocalcemia.

Laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Variable performance of 5 detection methods for identifying intravenous fluid contamination in basic metabolic panels at an academic medical center.

Laboratory medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 5, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.6K

Reliability and Validity of Proposed Risk Stratification Methods for Laboratory Developed Tests.

Jeffrey S Mohlman1, Jonathan R Genzen1, Ronald L Weiss1

  • 1Department of Pathology, University of Utah and ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Laboratory Medicine
|September 1, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Different risk stratification proposals for laboratory developed tests (LDTs) showed varied reliability and validity. Thorough evaluation of LDT risk methods is crucial before implementation to ensure accuracy and consistency.

Keywords:
classificationlaboratory developed testmeasurementreliabilityrisk assessmentvalidity

More Related Videos

A Standard and Reliable Method to Fabricate Two-Dimensional Nanoelectronics
07:12

A Standard and Reliable Method to Fabricate Two-Dimensional Nanoelectronics

Published on: August 28, 2018

10.5K
Development and Validation of a Quantitative PCR Method for Equid Herpesvirus-2 Diagnostics in Respiratory Fluids
09:57

Development and Validation of a Quantitative PCR Method for Equid Herpesvirus-2 Diagnostics in Respiratory Fluids

Published on: March 17, 2016

29.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 5, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.6K
A Standard and Reliable Method to Fabricate Two-Dimensional Nanoelectronics
07:12

A Standard and Reliable Method to Fabricate Two-Dimensional Nanoelectronics

Published on: August 28, 2018

10.5K
Development and Validation of a Quantitative PCR Method for Equid Herpesvirus-2 Diagnostics in Respiratory Fluids
09:57

Development and Validation of a Quantitative PCR Method for Equid Herpesvirus-2 Diagnostics in Respiratory Fluids

Published on: March 17, 2016

29.1K

Area of Science:

  • Medical diagnostics
  • Regulatory science
  • Health policy

Background:

  • Laboratory developed tests (LDTs) play a crucial role in clinical diagnostics.
  • Standardized risk stratification for LDTs is essential for regulatory oversight and patient safety.
  • Existing proposals for LDT risk stratification vary, necessitating an evaluation of their consistency and accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the validity and reliability of different laboratory developed test (LDT) risk stratification proposals.
  • To determine if various risk stratification methods yield differing risk levels for selected LDTs.
  • To evaluate interrater agreement rates across different LDT risk stratification proposals.

Main Methods:

  • Four reviewers applied six distinct risk stratification proposals to four selected LDTs.
  • Interrater agreement was calculated to assess the reliability of the proposals.
  • A consensus risk categorization and concordance rate were established to measure the validity of the proposals.

Main Results:

  • Interrater agreement (reliability) varied significantly, ranging from 38% to 100%.
  • Concordance rates (validity) also showed considerable variation, from 20% to 100%.
  • The observed spectrum of reliability and validity depended on the specific policy and LDT being categorized.

Conclusions:

  • A wide range of reliability and validity was observed among the evaluated LDT risk stratification proposals.
  • The effectiveness of risk stratification methods for LDTs is proposal- and LDT-dependent.
  • Extensive evaluations of reliability and validity are recommended for any proposed LDT risk-stratification method prior to legislative implementation.