Advanced head and neck surgical techniques: A survey of US otolaryngology resident perspectives

To assess the perspectives of OHNS residents with regards to their training in the following advanced head and neck surgery techniques: transoral robotic surgery (TORS), transoral laser microsurgery (TLM), sialendoscopy, and surgeon-performed ultrasound (SP-US) for possible curricula development.

Cross-sectional survey. A 20-item questionnaire was electronically distributed to OHNS residency programs assessing volume of cases, training barriers, satisfaction, additional training preferences, and pertinence to future practice.

One hundred thirty-one residents completed the questionnaire. Trainee satisfaction with advanced techniques did not vary significantly with level of training (PGY) or intent to pursue fellowship. Residents who participated in more TLM, sialendoscopy, and SP-US cases were significantly more likely to be satisfied with their training (all p<0.05). The most frequently reported limitation to training was low home institution procedure volume. Seventy-eight of 123 respondents (63.4%) indicated insufficient opportunity to participate in TORS, with most residents reporting that TORS was preferentially performed by attendings (59/78, 75.6%). Forty-five of 126 (35.7%) reported having adequate access to skills training in TORS, compared to 43.6%, 48.4%, and 54.8% for sialendoscopy, TLM, and SP-US, respectively. A vast majority expressed interest in home institution-sponsored training courses in SP-US (120/127, 94.5%) and sialendoscopy (105/129, 81.4%). Many anticipated using SP-US (63.3%) and sialendoscopy (49.6%) in their future practices.

Greater resident participation in advanced head and neck surgical procedures is associated with higher trainee satisfaction. There is a possible need for additional home institution-sponsored training courses, especially in sialendoscopy and SP-US.

N/A.