Clinical characteristics and survival of patients with multiple metachronous esophageal tumor
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Fahad Mukhtar1, Omonigho M Bubu1, Luu Hung N1
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 13201 Bruce B. Downs Boulevard, MDC56, Tampa, FL, United States.
Background:
The aim of this study is to determine the clinical characteristics and predictors of survival for patients with multiple metachronous esophageal tumors (MMET) and to compare the survival with patients that have single esophageal tumor (SET).
Method:
We identified all cases of primary esophageal cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program database from 2000 to 2013. The primary outcome was the development of a second esophageal cancer six months after the diagnosis of the first tumor. A secondary outcome was disease-specific death from esophageal cancer. Chi-square test was used to compare the tumor and demographic characteristics of patients with SET versus the first and second tumor characteristics of patients with MMET. Logistic regression was used to obtain the odds ratios between patients with secondary tumors and those with primary tumors. Accelerated life model was performed for patients with MMET to determine the predictors of survival.
Results:
Patients with MMET were more likely to have localized stage disease compared to those with SET (P < 0.0001). Distant stage disease for both first tumor (β = -0.402, P = 0.003) and second tumor (β = -0.301, P = 0.033) were predictors of increased mortality. The interval between the first and second tumor affected survival. Intervals of 2-5 years and > 5 years were associated with a reduced hazard with a β = 0.53 and 1.13, P < 0.0001, respectively.
Conclusion:
Early development of a second tumor in MMET is associated with poorer survival. Patients with MMET may benefit from regular follow-up and intervention to prevent the development of a second tumor.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Characteristics of Life
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...

