Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Determination of Mitochondrial Morphology in Live Cells Using Confocal Microscopy
Published on: July 3, 2025
Microglial morphology determined with confocal and two-photon laser scanning microscopy.
Smaranda Ioana Mitran1, Emilia Burada, Cornelia Andreea Tănasie
1Center of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania; adrian.balseanu@umfcv.ro, mirea_cecil@yahoo.com.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy (cLSM) and two-photon laser scanning microscopy (2P-LSM) reveal comparable microglia morphology. However, slight differences in branch analysis necessitate careful interpretation of microglia activation states based on imaging methods.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Immunology
- Cell Biology
Background:
- Microglia are the primary immune cells of the central nervous system.
- Microglia morphology is a key indicator of their immune status, distinguishing between active and surveilling states.
- Accurate assessment of microglia morphology is crucial for understanding neuroinflammation and neurological diseases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare microglia morphology using confocal laser scanning microscopy (cLSM) and two-photon laser scanning microscopy (2P-LSM).
- To analyze differences in microglia branching patterns between in vivo and fixed tissue imaging.
- To evaluate the impact of imaging methodology on the interpretation of microglia activation states.
Main Methods:
- Investigated microglia morphology in 14-16 weeks old male transgenic mice (n=6).
- Utilized both in vivo and fixed tissue imaging with cLSM and 2P-LSM.
- Performed manual tracking and quantitative analysis of microglia branching parameters, including branch number and length across different orders.
Main Results:
- Overall microglia branching morphology showed no significant difference between cLSM and 2P-LSM.
- A higher number of fifth-order branches were observed with both cLSM and 2P-LSM in both in vivo and fixed samples.
- While largely comparable, subtle differences between imaging methods warrant consideration.
Conclusions:
- cLSM and 2P-LSM provide largely comparable data for microglia morphology analysis.
- Minor discrepancies in branch analysis between methods necessitate caution when classifying microglia as active or surveilling based solely on morphology.
- The dynamic nature of microglia requires careful consideration of the imaging technique used when labeling their activation state.
Related Concept Videos
Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Fundamental Principles
Accelerated...
Leaky Scanning
Microbial Morphologies
Determining Order of Reaction
Determination

