Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: one step versus two step approach. A meta-analysis of randomized trials
Gabriele Saccone1, Adeeb Khalifeh2, Huda B Al-Kouatly3
1Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Abstract:
Objective: Worldwide controversy exists regarding the best approach and criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening and diagnosis. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials was to assess the incidence of maternal and neonatal outcomes comparing the one step with the two step approach for the diagnosis of GDM.Methods: Electronic databases were searched from their inception until June 2018. We included all the randomized trials comparing the one step versus the two step method for screening and diagnosis of GDM. The primary outcome was the incidence of large for gestational age (LGA), defined as birth weight >90th percentile. Meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird, to produce summary treatment effects in terms of relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).Results: Four randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (n = 2582 participants) were identified as relevant and included in the meta-analysis. Women screened with the one step approach had a significantly lower risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, including LGA (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.83), admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29-0.84) and neonatal hypoglycemia (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.95), compared to those randomized to the screening with the two step approach. The one step approach was also associated with lower mean birth weight (mean difference -112.91 grams, 95% CI -190.48 to -35.33). No significant difference in the incidence of GDM was found comparing the one step versus the two step approach (8.3 versus 4.4%; RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.93-2.75).Conclusions: This study provides high quality evidence that the diagnosis of GDM by the one step approach is associated with better perinatal outcomes, including lower incidences of LGA, NICU admission and neonatal hypoglycemia, compared to the two step approach. Based on these findings, we recommend screening of GDM using the one-step approach.
Related Concept Videos
01:22Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
03:08Rate-Determining Steps
In a multistep reaction mechanism, one of the elementary steps progresses significantly slower than the others. This slowest step is called the rate-limiting step (or rate-determining step). A reaction cannot proceed faster than its slowest step, and hence, the rate-determining step limits the overall reaction rate.
The concept of rate-determining step can be understood from the analogy of a 4-lane freeway with a short-stretch of traffic-bottleneck caused due to...
01:22Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
01:18Steps in Outbreak Investigation
01:14Steps in the Modeling Process
Attention is the first necessary component for observational learning. It involves focusing on what the model is doing and saying. For example, if you decide to take a drawing class to enhance your skills, you need to pay close attention to the instructor's words and hand movements. The characteristics of the model significantly...
01:22Steps for Free-Body Diagram
To find the acceleration of the system, it is first necessary to calculate the net force on the system. In order to accomplish this, a free-body diagram can be created to...