Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Published on: May 8, 2018
Retrospective evaluation of decision-making for pancreatic stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy
Marguerite Tyran1, Naomi Jiang2, Minsong Cao2
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Background/Purpose:
Stereotactic-magnetic-resonance-guided-online-adaptive-radiotherapy (SMART) is a promising tool for pancreas stereotactic-body-radiotherapy. Our online-adaptive-radiotherapy (On-ART) process relies on daily image overview by the managing radiation-oncologist, who determines the need for creating a predicted plan if significant interfractional anatomical changes are noted. Predicted plans are achieved through applying the baseline plan on deformed and manually adjusted contours based on daily imaging. If the dose to the target volume or organs-at-risk (OARs) violate constraints, an adapted plan is generated and delivered for treatment. In-depth review of daily images and deformed contours is limited by time and inter-observer variations. This study evaluates the reliability of our On-ART decision-making process. All fractions retrospectively underwent a predicted plan for off-line decision-making to adapt (Off-ART). Decisions to adapt were compared using On-ART and Off-ART approaches.
Material/Methods:
Thirty-five sets of daily images were analyzed from seven patients who underwent five fractions of SMART. Each OAR was fully re-contoured off-line by the same physician for each fraction. Off-ART decision was re-evaluated for each fraction.
Results:
N = 14/35 fractions were adapted based on On-ART decision-making versus N = 25/35 with Off-ART. The concordance between On-ART and Off-ART decision was 87.5% for the 16 fractions using a predicted plan online and 42% for the 19 fractions using only visual image review for On-ART decision-making.
Conclusions:
Daily-image visual review is not reliable to determine benefit or not for adaptive radiation-therapy. Online predicted plan, based on deformed and manually adjusted contours, should be generated for every fraction that is delivered using SMART in order to reliably optimize treatment plans daily.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Adaptability of Cytoskeletal Filaments
Natural Selection and Adaptation
Beyond physical adaptations,...
Introduction to Innate and Adaptive Immunity
Innate immunity is the body's natural, nonspecific defense system that acts quickly to protect against pathogens. It incorporates physical barriers like skin and mucous membranes and cellular elements such as phagocytes and natural killer cells. This part of our immune system provides an immediate,...

