Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Personal Oral Infection Control, Low Birthweight, and Preterm Births in Appalachia West Virginia: A Cross-Sectional
R Constance Wiener1, Christopher Waters2
1Assistant Professor, Dental Practice and Rural Health, School of Dentistry, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, P.O. Box 9448 Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center Addition 104a, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Insights
Limited use of powered toothbrushes by pregnant women in West Virginia was associated with higher odds of preterm birth and low birthweight babies. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and develop effective interventions for improved maternal and infant health outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Public Health
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Background:
- West Virginia, particularly Appalachia, faces higher rates of preterm birth and low birthweight infants compared to national averages.
- While various factors influencing birth outcomes are studied, effective interventions remain limited.
- Personal oral infection control, including dental hygiene, presents a potential avenue for intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between inadequate personal oral infection control and adverse birth outcomes in pregnant women in West Virginia.
- Specifically, to evaluate the relationship between limited powered toothbrush use and the incidence of preterm birth and low birthweight babies.
Main Methods:
- Secondary data analysis of the West Virginia Healthy Start Helping Appalachian Parents and Infants (HAPI) Project (2005-2016).
- Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio of poor birth outcomes based on powered toothbrush usage frequency (less than 13 times/week vs. 13+ times/week).
Main Results:
- Analysis of 845 women revealed that infrequent powered toothbrush users (<13 times/week) had significantly higher odds of low birthweight babies (OR 2.07) and preterm birth (OR 1.78) in unadjusted models.
- These associations, while trending positive, did not maintain statistical significance after adjustments in the logistic regression analysis.
Conclusions:
- The study highlights a potential link between suboptimal oral hygiene practices and adverse pregnancy outcomes in the studied population.
- There is a critical need for developing and implementing targeted interventions to improve oral health among pregnant women.
- Further research is warranted to confirm these findings and explore effective strategies for reducing preterm birth and low birthweight rates.
Introduction:
Appalachia West Virginia has a higher prevalence of preterm and low birthweight babies than the US national prevalence. Many factors have been studied which are known to influence preterm births and low birthweight babies. There are limited interventions that are available to decrease the likelihood of preterm and low birthweight babies; however oral health and personal oral infection control may be helpful. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of limited personal oral infection control among pregnant West Virginia Appalachian women and poor birth outcomes (preterm and low birthweight babies).
Methods:
A secondary data analysis of data from the West Virginia Healthy Start Helping Appalachian Parents and Infants (HAPI) Project from 2005 to 2016 was conducted. The researchers determined the odds ratio of personal oral infection control with a powered toothbrush (use of the brush fewer than 13 times per week versus use of the brush 13 or more times per week) on poor birth outcomes.
Results:
There were 845 women who completed the oral health program within the HAPI project. In unadjusted logistic regression, women who used the powered toothbrush and brushed less frequently had greater odds of poor birth outcomes than women who brushed more frequently (odds ratio of 2.07 [1.18, 3.62] P = 0.011 for low birthweight babies; and an odds ratio of 1.78 [1.04, 3.02] P = 0.034 for preterm birth). The results remained positive but were no longer significant in adjusted analysis.
Conclusion:
There is a need to identify interventions that will benefit pregnant women so that their pregnancies result in healthy pregnancy outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
Birth Control Methods
Psychosexual Stages of Personality: Oral
Weaning, typically occurring...
Finding Volume Using Cross-Sectional Area
Profile Leveling and Cross Sections
Spinal Cord: Cross-sectional Anatomy
Gray Matter and its Components
Central to the gray matter is...

