Higher Predictive Value Positive for MMA Than ACA MTM Eligibility Criteria Among Racial and Ethnic Minorities: An

Yanru Qiao1, Christina A Spivey1, Junling Wang1

  • 11 The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA.

Insights

The Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) better identified medication issues in Black and Hispanic patients than the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This highlights disparities in medication management criteria across racial groups.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Pharmaceutical Policy
  • Health Equity

Background:

  • Medication Therapy Management (MTM) aims to optimize drug therapy and improve health outcomes.
  • Eligibility criteria for MTM programs under Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) and Affordable Care Act (ACA) may impact patient identification.
  • Racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare access and outcomes are a significant concern.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) of MTM eligibility criteria in identifying patients with medication utilization issues.
  • To compare the PPV of MMA and ACA criteria across different racial and ethnic groups.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of Medicare beneficiary data from 2012-2013 (n=2,213,594).
  • Identification of medication utilization issues using Pharmacy Quality Alliance measures.
  • Statistical analysis comparing PPV of MMA and ACA criteria across non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic White populations.

Main Results:

  • The MMA criteria demonstrated a higher PPV than ACA criteria in identifying patients with medication utilization issues.
  • Specifically, MMA showed a higher PPV among non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics compared to non-Hispanic Whites.
  • Odds ratios indicated MMA was associated with 9% and 17% higher PPV than ACA for Blacks and Hispanics, respectively, relative to Whites.

Conclusions:

  • The MMA eligibility criteria appear more effective than ACA criteria in identifying medication utilization issues among minority populations.
  • Findings suggest potential inequities in MTM program identification based on current eligibility standards.
  • Further research is needed to refine MTM criteria for equitable patient identification and care.

Related Concept Videos

Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
17.4K
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
11.1K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.3K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.1K
Minor Losses in Pipes01:25

Minor Losses in Pipes

In pipe systems, minor losses refer to energy losses arising from components such as valves, bends, fittings, expansions, and other features that disrupt the steady flow of fluid. These disturbances cause energy dissipation through turbulence and resistance, which engineers quantify to manage system efficiency effectively.
Valves play a significant role in generating minor losses by obstructing or redirecting the fluid flow. When a valve is closed or partially closed, it restricts the flow...
1.9K
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture01:27

Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture

Adolescents from ethnic minority backgrounds face a multifaceted journey in forming their identities, shaped by the intersections of cultural expectations and personal exploration. For these adolescents, identity formation involves not only typical developmental challenges but also navigating the perceptions and attitudes of the majority culture. As they grow, adolescents in ethnic minority groups often become increasingly aware of stereotypes, social biases, and discrimination, all of which...
344